Skip to main content

1-20 of 54 results for subject:"Metropolitan line"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The long-promised extension of the Metropolitan line from Croxley Green is running into financial difficulties. What assessment has my right hon. Friend made of the project, and what discussions have taken place with the Mayor of London and Transport for London?

Asked by
Bob Blackman (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 March 2017
Reference
624 c402
House
House of Commons

The basis of this project was that Hertfordshire County Council and the Department for Transport provided money to TfL for the extension work. The agreement was that TfL would meet any costs above the agreed price, and would retain any funds below the agreed price. That agreement was reached a couple of years ago. Quite a chunk of money has already been spent, including on the acquisition of a train. It is for the Mayor to complete this project, and I have asked him for his plans to do so.

Answered by
Lord Grayling (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 March 2017
Reference
624 c402
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what representations his Department has received from (a) the Mayor of London and (b) Transport of London on the cost of the Croxley rail link; and whether the Government plans to provide additional funding to support the development of that link.

Asked by
Bob Blackman (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2016
Reference
56736
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what the deficit is for the delivery of the Croxley rail link; and what plans his Department has for allocating additional funding required for that rail link.

Asked by
Bob Blackman (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2016
Reference
56923
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what information the Government holds on Transport for London's deficit for the delivery of the Croxley rail link; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Bob Blackman (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2016
Reference
56924
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Patrick McLoughlin
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
5 August 2013
Reference
SI 2013/1931
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

Application documents, environmental statement, maps and plans.

Type
Transport and Works Act order applications
Date
5 January 2012
Reference
TW 217 Commons & Lords Libraries

Rail Vehicle Accessibility (Non-Interoperable Rail System) (London Underground Metropolitan Line S8 Vehicles) Exemption Order 2011 (SI, 2011, No. 70), dated 13 January 2011 (by Act), with an Explanatory Memorandum (by Command). Coming into force 14 February 2011.

Department
Department for Transport
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
19 January 2011
Reference
SI 2011/70
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Rail Vehicle Accessibility (London Underground Metropolitan Line S8 Vehicles) Exemption Order 2010.

Member
Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c184GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this House has always demonstrated a keen interest in the accessibility of rail vehicles, and that is why we are here today. We know that, without public transport that they can use, disabled people are limited in their ability to get to work, visit friends and family, participate...

Member
Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c184-7GC
House
House of Lords

I was referring to the contract that must at the moment be in place for the new trains and for the improvements to be made to the old trains. I was asking: in that contract, what are the penalties if it is not met?

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c190GC
House
House of Lords

Will the date be met? The tension I am trying to get at is that we have these exemptions coming in. As I understand it, the new trains are all due to be delivered by 2020. What are the penalties to the company if they are not? It is not...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c190GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness is right to press this matter. From my understanding, there is no contractual obligation because the company responsible, Metronet, has gone into liquidation. Does LUL simply pick up what the bankrupt company has left and does it have to adopt all the contractual obligations? It seems a...

Member
Lord Bradshaw (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c191GC
House
House of Lords

We, too, support the order. In many respects the railway outside London is very old, as is much of its rolling stock, and the modifications necessary to meet these standards will be incredibly expensive. The noble Baroness touched on the subject of stations to which there will be no step-free...

Member
Lord Bradshaw (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c188GC
House
House of Lords

I apologise to the noble Baroness for misunderstanding her. I thought that she was asking about the national picture. The position with the Metropolitan line is that all the new trains are capable of complying with the regulations now. With the order, we are effectively holding back the implementation of...

Member
Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c190GC
House
House of Lords

I certainly did not wish to imply that the noble Baroness had not understood the details. It is obviously my fault for not understanding what she was saying and I apologise for that. The position is that the Secretary of State is required to ensure that all rail vehicles are...

Member
Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c191-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I start by thanking the Minister for his clear introduction of the order. I should say immediately that it is largely uncontentious, although it raises some issues about the amount of time that will elapse before Metropolitan line trains are fully compliant with the Disability Discrimination Act 1995....

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c187-8GC
House
House of Lords

What contractual constraints are on the company to deliver by 2020? Presumably, conditions are attached to the contract or the delivery date not being met. There must be something that says that the contract must be delivered at a certain time and that, if it is not, what the penalties...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c189GC
House
House of Lords

Would the Minister clarify that? We are talking principally about the Metropolitan line, where there is no franchise, is there not?

Member
Lord Bradshaw (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c190GC
House
House of Lords

I think that the noble Baroness was referring to the compliance of the national railway.

Member
Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c190GC
House
House of Lords