Skip to main content

1-20 of 62 results for subject:"Polly Peck"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, when her Department's inspectors were appointed to investigate the affairs of Polly Peck; when the report was published; what the report cost; and what regulatory action was taken against auditors.

Asked by
Austin Mitchell (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 March 2003
Reference
100982; 401 c164W
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on donations given by Asil Nadir to the Conservative Party.
Asked by
David Winnick (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
19 June 1997
Reference
296 c453
House
House of Commons
What are his proposals in respect of the prosecution of Mr Asil Nadir in the United Kingdom.
Asked by
David Winnick (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
19 June 1997
Reference
296 c453; 2921
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Morris of Aberavon (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
19 June 1997
Reference
296 c453
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Morris of Aberavon (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
19 June 1997
Reference
296 c453
House
House of Commons

That this House calls upon the Conservative Party to uphold its repeated pledges to return in full to the administrators of Polly Peck all donations previously given to them by disgraced Turkish Cypriot fugitive Asil Nadir upon the production of independent evidence proving its payment; notes the findings of Touche...

Primary sponsor
Alan Meale (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
30 October 1996
Reference
104
House
House of Commons

To comment on the current position in relation to the preparation of the case against Asil Nadir. (Failed OPQ). - Includes figures.

Asked by
David Winnick (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 June 1996
Reference
31641; 279 c335W;279 c329W
House
House of Commons

What action is currently being taken by the Serious Fraud Office to investigate monies stolen from Polly Peck plc for the purposes of political donations in the United Kingdom.

Asked by
David Winnick (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 June 1996
Reference
30666; 278 c389-90W
House
House of Commons

That this House calls upon the Conservative Party to uphold its repeated pledges to return donations to the administrators of Polly Peck previously given to them by disgraced Turkish Cypriot fugitive Asil Nadir upon the production of independent evidence, now disclosed by Touche Ross, that its source was of a...

Primary sponsor
Alan Meale (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
21 May 1996
Reference
917
House
House of Commons

What representations he, or the Bank of England, has received from the Swiss authorities in relation to United Kingdom financial instruments sold to Swiss and international investors in Polly Peck, Mountleigh, Maxwell Communications and Ferranti/ISC.

Asked by
Michael Meacher (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 July 1994
Reference
246 c270W
House
House of Commons
Deposited by
Attorney General
Type
Deposited papers
Date
11 January 1994
Reference
Dep 9945
House
House of Commons
Deposited by
Attorney General
Type
Deposited papers
Date
11 January 1994
Reference
HINF 93/1785

Statement concerning the Serious Fraud Office. - Inc fact that after statement to the House on 30 June 1993 227 c965-77, Mr Asil Nadir's former solicitor, wrote in response to a general invitation from the director of the Serious Fraud Office & that those concerned about the working of the...

Asked by
Michael Mates (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 December 1993
Reference
233 c748-50W;233 c744-6W
House
House of Commons

Pursuant to his oral statement of 30th June, 227 c967, when he concluded that there was no credible evidence implicating the judge in the case of Regina v Nadir and Turner in a conspiracy.

Asked by
Michael Mates (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 July 1993
Reference
229 c533-4W;229 c533W
House
House of Commons

When he expects the police investigation under the direction of the Director of Public Prosecutions into the alleged conspiracy to bribe Mr Justice Tucker to be completed.

Asked by
Michael Mates (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 July 1993
Reference
229 c533-4W;229 c533W
House
House of Commons

When he reviewed the evidence relating to allegations of involvement by the judges in the case of Regina v. Nadir and Turner in a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.

Asked by
Michael Mates (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 July 1993
Reference
229 c533-4W;229 c533W
House
House of Commons

When he first learnt of the allegation that the judge in the case of Regina v Nadir and Turner was involved in a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.

Asked by
Michael Mates (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 July 1993
Reference
229 c533-4W;229 c533W
House
House of Commons

Statement on his correspondence with the honourable Member for East Hampshire relating to the Serious Fraud Office. - Inc fact that documents are being published today under the Parliamentary Papers Act 1840 pursuant to a motion of the House. Includes letters & meeting notes together with material enclosed with letters.

Asked by
Ian Twinn (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 July 1993
Reference
227 c612W;227 c610W
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers
Date
1 July 1993
Reference
HC 787 1992/93
House
House of Commons

What considerations were taken into account in deciding whether to appoint DTI Inspectors under the Companies Acts in the cases of Maxwell Communications Corporation and Polly Peck International.

Asked by
Jim Cousins (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 1993
Reference
227 c511W;227 c509W
House
House of Commons