Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,828 results for subject:"Qualified majority voting"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Statement by Lord Bates on 19 January (HLWS1308) concerning the Economic and Financial Affairs Council meeting of 12 February, what position was taken by the UK during the exchange of views on the European Commission’s proposal to move to qualified majority voting...

Asked by
Lord Stoddart of Swindon (Independent Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 March 2019
Reference
HL13938
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what areas of policy were transferred from unanimity to qualified majority voting by the Lisbon Treaty; whether the United Kingdom has opt-outs from any of those areas; and, if so, from which areas.

Asked by
Lord Stoddart of Swindon (Independent Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 October 2015
Reference
HL2765
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government which policy areas are entirely under the control of the national parliaments of European Union member states; and which are subject to (1) unanimity, and (2) qualified majority voting, in the Council of Ministers. [HL6026]

Asked by
Lord Pearson of Rannoch (UK Independence Party)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 March 2014
Reference
HL6026; 753 c133WA
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on motion to agree the second report from the Procedure Select Committee (HL 51 2009-10). Agreed to on question. (Debated with Lords motion to agree the third report from the Procedure Select Committee (HL 82 2009-10)).

Lead member
Lord Brabazon of Tara
Department
Chairman of Committees (HL)
Type
Debates
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c588-92
House
House of Lords

Moved by That the 2nd Report from the Select Committee (HL Paper 51) be agreed to. Relevant Documents: 2nd Report from the Procedure Committee

Member
Lord Brabazon of Tara (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c588
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I had not intended to speak but on behalf of the European Union Committee, I thank the Procedure Committee and the Leader of the House for all the work that they have put in to bring these proposals forward. That has required a lot of work and a...

Member
Lord Roper (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c590
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Roper, and I am grateful that he was here just in case anybody else should have asked questions about the Lisbon treaty, with which I have to say I am not particularly familiar. I beg to move.

Member
Lord Brabazon of Tara (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c590
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in speaking to this Motion, I shall speak also to the second Motion in my name relating to the committee’s 3rd Report. The bulk of these two reports is taken up with proposals arising out of the Lisbon treaty, which came into force on 1 December 2009, and...

Member
Lord Brabazon of Tara (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c588-90
House
House of Lords

I draw attention to paragraph 5.18 on page 12 regarding the guidance on Questions, which states: ""Questions do not ask about the internal affairs of another country"." I am very daunted by the footnote, which refers to Erskine May, 23rd edition, because this is clearly derived from a previous decision....

Member
Earl of Sandwich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c591
House
House of Lords

I certainly undertake to look at that again but, as I said my opening remarks, there is nothing new in the rules. As the footnote says, it is covered by Erskine May. I am not quite sure when the 23rd edition was published—I will have to come back to the...

Member
Lord Brabazon of Tara (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c591-2
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government which policy areas remain subject to national veto under the Treaties of Rome, as amended.

Asked by
Lord Pearson of Rannoch (UK Independence Party)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 December 2009
Reference
326; 715 c130WA
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think I am entirely within the rules, which are to tidy up what has been said before. This is a new amendment in view of new circumstances that were not there when this subject was originally debated. I trust it is helpful to your Lordships. In any...

Member
Lord Pearson of Rannoch (UK Independence Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 June 2008
Reference
702 c1075-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, for the past 33 years I have had the privilege of being a guest of the Irish nation, and I was present for 12 days of the referendum campaign and read their literature. I notice from the two speeches that we have just heard that the Irish referendum...

Member
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 June 2008
Reference
702 c1076-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord keeps referring to Brussels. It is in fact the member states acting unanimously, is it not?

Member
Lord Roper (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 June 2008
Reference
702 c1074
House
House of Lords

My Lords, more precisely, it is on proposals advanced in secret by the unelected Commission, passed in secret by the bureaucrats from the nation states in the shape of COREPER and passed, again in secret, in the Council of Ministers, who are the Ministers from the national states. The point...

Member
Lord Pearson of Rannoch (UK Independence Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 June 2008
Reference
702 c1074-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am fascinated to discover that the Commission has allocated exactly €235 million for this information campaign under the original Article 235, now subtly renumbered Article 352. This is clearly a very deep conspiracy. I think it sounds rather like the Da Vinci Code.

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 June 2008
Reference
702 c1075
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord says that every time there has been a consultation, this view has been expressed. I assume, therefore, that he is referring to the referendums on the previous treaty as well as on this one. If that is the case, he ought to remember that on...

Member
Lord Roper (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 June 2008
Reference
702 c1077
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have had a long discussion and noble Lords will bear with me for a moment if I touch on a matter that has not yet been touched on. Some people have always been in a state of denial and, as far as I can see, always will...

Member
Lord Waddington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 June 2008
Reference
702 c1077
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the amendment. The Foreign Secretary said in his Statement the other day: "““The rules of the treaty and of the EU are clear. All 27 member states must ratify the treaty for it to come into force … There is no question of ignoring the Irish...

Member
Lord Neill of Bladen (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 June 2008
Reference
702 c1034-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sorry that noble Lords do not like to be told the legal position. I would have thought that the rule of law would be a welcome doctrine in this House.

Member
Lord Neill of Bladen (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 June 2008
Reference
702 c1037
House
House of Lords