Skip to main content

1-20 of 449 results for subject:"Restrictive practices"

Type

-
Early day motions (9)
+ Legislation (26) + Acts (2)
-
Public acts (2)
+ Bills (4) + Public bills (4)
-
Government bills (2)
+ Private members' bills (2)
-
Ten minute rule bills (2)
+ Delegated legislation (20) + Statutory instruments (20)
-
Deregulation orders (2)
+ Members' contributions (176)
-
Oral answers to questions (44)
+ Oral questions (44)
-
Prime Minister's questions (2)
-
Proceeding contributions (88)
+ Parliamentary committees (20) + Committee proceedings (13)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (7)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
European Committee proceedings (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (4)
-
Select Committee reports (6)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (1)
+ Parliamentary papers (57)
-
Command papers (7)
-
Consultation papers (6)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (1)
-
Deposited papers (25)
-
House of Commons papers (17)
-
House of Lords papers (2)
-
Impact assessments (2)
+ Unprinted papers (4)
-
Draft deregulation orders (proposal) (2)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (38) + Debates (30)
-
Adjournment debates (7)
+ Committee proceedings (13)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (7)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
European Committee proceedings (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (4)
+ Legislative debates (21)
-
Debates on bills (19)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (2)
-
Questions for short debate (1)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (1)
+ Statements (3) + Oral statements (3)
-
Ministerial statements (3)
+ Written corrections (1)
-
Ministerial corrections (1)
+ Parliamentary questions (185) + Oral questions (44)
-
Prime Minister's questions (2)
-
Written questions (141)
+ Research briefings (2)
-
Commons Briefing papers (2)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Written evidence reported to the House. Committee adjourned.

Lead member
Kevin Hollinrake; Paul Scully
Answering member
Seema Malhotra
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology; Department for Business and Trade
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill Committee
Date
15 June 2023
House
House of Commons

Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill

The following is an extract from the Second Reading debate on the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill on 17 May 2023.

Between 2009 and 2019, GAFAM—Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft—made more than 400 acquisitions without any regulatory intervention or referral through the voluntary mechanisms.

[Official...

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Ministerial corrections
Date
5 June 2023
Reference
733 c7MC
House
House of Commons

The SNP welcomes very much the aims and objectives of the Bill, which broadly speaking fit well with the enhanced protections we have been calling for in the online space for some years.

For markets to be effective, they need a number of things, chief among them good market information for...

Member
Richard Thomson (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2023
Reference
732 cc890-4
House
House of Commons

I think we are all united in wanting to stop fake and damaging reviews, which are so unfair, but has the hon. Gentleman thought about how we would actually do it? Defining them, and deciding who judges that they are such, is not easy.

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2023
Reference
732 c895
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Member is absolutely right that it is not easy, but that does not mean it is something that we should avoid trying to tackle, or that we should not try to come up with a way of improving the competitive environment. I am certainly more than happy...

Member
Richard Thomson (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2023
Reference
732 c895
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman therefore support our approach, which is to consult in parallel with the passage of the Bill through both Houses about things like drip pricing and fake reviews, so that we can have that open dialogue and make sure that we get the answers right, including to...

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2023
Reference
732 c895
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for his intervention. Indeed, I would be quite happy to see what comes back from that consultation, because there are areas of real concern. If we can find consensus on how those matters can best be tackled—we might not be able to please everybody, but we...

Member
Richard Thomson (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2023
Reference
732 c895
House
House of Commons

Good luck!

Member
Alex Davies-Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2023
Reference
732 c895
House
House of Commons

I hear the hon. Member for Pontypridd say “Good luck”, but we will see how it goes. The Bill certainly does much that it needs to, but there are quite a few things that it misses; let us see what we can make it hit over the period ahead. As...

Member
Richard Thomson (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2023
Reference
732 c895
House
House of Commons

I rise, as other Members have done, in support of the Bill. It is a very important piece of legislation that has been long discussed and much looked forward to. It is now safely on the Floor of the House and we wish it a safe passage as it goes...

Member
Damian Collins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2023
Reference
732 cc895-6
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that we should fully support what my right hon. Friend the Member for Wokingham (John Redwood) has suggested as a model for competition? Competition itself does require to be amended.

Member
Bob Stewart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2023
Reference
732 c896
House
House of Commons

I thank my right hon. Friend for his question, and my right hon. Friend the Member for Wokingham (John Redwood) made an excellent opening speech from the Back Benches. My concern is that in digital markets we have an imperfect market. We are at a point in time where the...

Member
Damian Collins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2023
Reference
732 cc896-8
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2023
Reference
732 c898
House
House of Commons

I declare my interest as set out on the Register of Members’ Financial Interests. I am grateful to the Government for having reflected in the Bill so many of the recommendations in my Committee’s report on post-Brexit competition and consumer law policy. Although I am grateful to the Minister and...

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2023
Reference
732 cc898-9
House
House of Commons

I agree with everything the hon. Member has said so far. Does he agree with the proposal of the Regulatory Reform Group, which I chair, that there should be a specialist Committee to look at the regulators on an ongoing basis, in addition to the work that his and other...

Member
Bim Afolami (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2023
Reference
732 c899
House
House of Commons

If I answered shortly with the word “Yes” it would ruin the rest of my speech, so I am going to keep reading through my notes. However, the hon. Member, having asked that question, will understand the direction of travel.

The Minister was pointing at himself, I think noting for the...

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2023
Reference
732 cc899-900
House
House of Commons

Is there not a clear distinction? We and the Government should not intervene in individual decisions that under the law are in the regulators’ remit, but Parliament and Ministers should take a timely and regular interest in the overall achievement—the cost, whether they need more resource or less resource, and...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2023
Reference
732 c900
House
House of Commons

I find myself in the unusual situation of being in complete agreement with the right hon. Gentleman, and perhaps that shows the cross-party support for the points I am making about the Bill.

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2023
Reference
732 c900
House
House of Commons

I echo the points about the need for a careful balance between not interfering from this place, while also ensuring accountability. I believe—parliamentary historians will put me right if I am wrong—that about a decade ago there used to be a Regulatory Reform Committee in this place. It was rarely...

Member
John Penrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2023
Reference
732 c901
House
House of Commons

I do not claim to be a parliamentary historian, but the Regulatory Reform Committee is very modern history. About two years ago I got a call from the Government Chief Whip, telling me that the Government were collapsing the Regulatory Reform Committee and merging it with mine, but that I...

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2023
Reference
732 cc901-2
House
House of Commons