Skip to main content

1-20 of 2,953 results for subject:"Standard spending assessments"

Type

-
Early day motions (22)
+ Members' contributions (711)
-
Business questions (4)
-
Oral answers to questions (332)
-
Oral question time interventions (1)
+ Oral questions (332)
-
Prime Minister's questions (23)
-
Proceeding contributions (46)
+ Parliamentary committees (19) + Committee proceedings (8)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (4)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (3)
-
Select Committee reports (8)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (3)
+ Parliamentary papers (300)
-
Command papers (3)
-
Consultation papers (11)
-
Deposited papers (259)
-
House of Commons papers (36)
-
House of Lords papers (1)
-
Impact assessments (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (140) + Debates (90)
-
Adjournment debates (76)
+ Committee proceedings (8)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (4)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (3)
+ Legislative debates (6)
-
Debates on bills (5)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (1)
-
Opposition days (4)
-
Questions for short debate (1)
+ Petitions and observations (7)
-
Observations on petitions (3)
-
Paper petitions (4)
+ Statements (25) + Oral statements (24)
-
Ministerial statements (24)
-
Written statements (1)
+ Parliamentary questions (2,113)
-
Business questions (4)
+ Oral questions (332)
-
Prime Minister's questions (23)
-
Written questions (1,777)
+ Petitions and observations (7)
-
Observations on petitions (3)
-
Paper petitions (4)
+ Research briefings (6)
-
Commons Briefing papers (6)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

If the hon. Lady is here, she can speak for herself. Anyway, I was criticised by Opposition Members for making the formula simpler. I remind the House that the formula that I have announced today is a significant simplification of its predecessor, and that it builds on simplifications introduced previously...

Member
Phil Woolas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c574
House
House of Commons

Would the Minister agree that the precept that he has just announced has been damaged by the Chancellor’s announcement about pensioner rebate last Wednesday? Will he answer this simple question: when the Deputy Prime Minister and the Chancellor agreed the block grant figure last December, did the Chancellor have the...

Member
Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c575
House
House of Commons

Yes, I am hopeful, and the Government, as regulator of the scheme, stand ready to facilitate discussions between the employers represented by the LGA and the representatives of members of the scheme, the trade unions. Our policy is that the taxpayer should not be asked to pick up any additional...

Member
Phil Woolas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c574
House
House of Commons

What message does the Minister have for pensioners in my Shropshire constituency, given that they have just had a 4.9 per cent. council tax increase from Labour-led Telford and Wrekin council, and that they no longer have a £200 rebate? Do the Government not realise that such increases are driving...

Member
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c576-7
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for making that point, which he has made before in this Chamber and outside it. We did of course make changes to the use of population statistics to ensure that, alongside previous trends, future projections are taken into account to a greater extent in the...

Member
Phil Woolas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c578
House
House of Commons

The 2006–07 settlement includes an element for population growth, but it is based on census data and is then projected forward. That disadvantages local people in high-growth areas such as Kettering, which is affected by population growth in Milton Keynes and the south midlands. Will the Minister undertake to look...

Member
Philip Hollobone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c577-8
House
House of Commons

In my statement and in previous answers, I pointed out that one has to look at support for pensioners and others on fixed incomes in the round. The hon. Gentleman ignores the fact that the pension credit, help with winter fuel payments and the council tax benefit system have helped...

Member
Phil Woolas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c577
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister explain what has changed since before the general election, when pensioners were bribed with a £200 council tax rebate?

Member
Peter Bone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c577
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for raising that point again. As I said in my statement, the average council tax increases of 12.9 per cent. that took place some years ago were regrettable. However, he must accept that council tax levels are set by local authorities. Against the background of...

Member
Phil Woolas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c577
House
House of Commons

Of course, I would be willing to meet my hon. Friend. Last year, we gave, and fulfilled, commitments to meet all councils and Members concerned about their local authorities’ budgets and about council tax capping decisions. It may be helpful to my hon. Friend if I emphasise the point that...

Member
Phil Woolas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c578
House
House of Commons

I apologise to the Minister and to the House for being absent when the Minister made his statement. I was chairing a Standing Committee and obviously could not leave the Chair. I am greatly concerned that City of York council has one of the largest council tax rises this year...

Member
Hugh Bayley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c578
House
House of Commons

What estimate has the Minister made of the effect of the local government pension scheme on council tax levels in 2006–07 and in subsequent years? Against the background of tomorrow’s industrial action in local councils, is he still hopeful that a settlement can be found that will modernise the pension...

Member
Paddy Tipping (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c574
House
House of Commons

May I raise with the Minister the impact of the capping criteria on authorities that have historically had a low council tax, or, in the case of the Lancashire police authority, a low precept? Over a number of years, it has wished to raise its precept to its expenditure and...

Member
David S Borrow (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c575
House
House of Commons

The crisis in social services is bound to be made worse by the formula because of increasing demands from old people’s and, indeed, young persons’ services, but that must be seen in the context of the crisis in the NHS as well, owing to increasingly close links between it and...

Member
David Curry (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c574
House
House of Commons

Of course the Government recognise—and have recognised in their joint work with the LGA—the pressures faced by social services, particularly services for adults and the elderly. It would be nonsensical to deny the existence of those pressures. But those pressures, the result of largely demographic changes, also apply to central...

Member
Phil Woolas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c575
House
House of Commons

Not yet. I congratulate the hon. Gentleman on his new position and look forward to debating this important policy subject with him. At least the hon. Gentleman’s points, in contrast to those made by the hon. Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Mr. Pickles), are based on a policy. At least...

Member
Phil Woolas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c573-4
House
House of Commons

indicated dissent.

Member
Lord Stunell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c573
House
House of Commons

I do not accept the premise of the hon. Gentleman’s question. Indeed, it provides a classic example of what I call the Liberal Democrat single transferable argument. When the council tax level is beyond what the hon. Gentleman thinks it should be and Liberal Democrats have influence in local councils,...

Member
Phil Woolas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c576
House
House of Commons

What note has the Minister taken of Trowbridge town council’s 48 per cent. increase in precept, which means that the precept far exceeds the district council element of the council tax bill? Does he not agree that that is simply unacceptable?

Member
Andrew Murrison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c576
House
House of Commons

I have not received any praise—I suppose that I should not really have expected any—for my decision on Aylesbury Vale and Wellingborough. The hon. Gentleman may think that I am going to study the figures for parish and town councils, but I am not; the legislation does not cover that...

Member
Phil Woolas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2006
Reference
444 c576
House
House of Commons