1-20 of 290 results for subject:Autobiography
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.985 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Autobiography
- We searched for
- subject_t:Autobiography OR subject_t:Memoirs OR subject_ses:90287
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what records his Department holds on the use of the Radcliffe exclusion rule recommended by the Radcliffe Committee of Enquiry into Civil Service Security Procedure.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what records his Department holds on the use of the Radcliffe exclusion rule recommended by the Radcliffe Committee of Enquiry into Civil Service Security Procedure.
The then Prime Minister (Mr Blair) announced to the House on 19 June 1997 (Col WA 246) the creation of the independent Security Vetting Appeals Panel, to hear appeals against the refusal or withdrawal of security clearance. The establishment of the Panel, chaired by a senior retired member of the judiciary, brought to an end the role of the Three Advisers who, since 1948, had been available to consider cases where security clearance was refused or withdrawn on the grounds of subversion. The last reference to the Three Advisers was made in 1967. In his statement to Parliament on 27 July 2010, the Prime Minister (Mr Cameron) set out HMG policy on security vetting underlining its critical importance in protecting UK interests and its application to those with access to sensitive Government assets and placed in the library a document setting out Government policy in this area (Government Security Controls)
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/299547/HMG_Personnel_Security_Controls.pdf.
This includes the mechanisms available to individuals to appeal against adverse security vetting decisions. The Government continues to attach importance to security vetting as part of its work to protect the country and its citizens, but it recognises the rights of individuals to appeal against adverse decisions internally and, if they are aggrieved about the outcome, to appeal to the Panel.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether there is a right to appeal against use of the Radcliffe exclusion rule.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether there is a right to appeal against use of the Radcliffe exclusion rule.
I refer the Hon. Member to my answer of 23 October 2017 [109149]. Considerations of exclusions are part of this process.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether the Radcliffe exclusion rule recommended by the Radcliffe Committee of Enquiry into Civil Service Security Procedure remains in force; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether the Radcliffe exclusion rule recommended by the Radcliffe Committee of Enquiry into Civil Service Security Procedure remains in force; and if he will make a statement.
The then Prime Minister (Mr Blair) announced to the House on 19 June 1997 (Col WA 246) the creation of the independent Security Vetting Appeals Panel, to hear appeals against the refusal or withdrawal of security clearance. The establishment of the Panel, chaired by a senior retired member of the judiciary, brought to an end the role of the Three Advisers who, since 1948, had been available to consider cases where security clearance was refused or withdrawn on the grounds of subversion. In his statement to Parliament on 27 July 2010, the Prime Minister (Mr Cameron) set out HMG policy on security vetting underlining its critical importance in protecting UK interests and its application to those with access to sensitive Government assets. The Government continues to attach importance to security vetting as part of its work to protect the country and its citizens, but it recognises the rights of individuals to appeal against adverse decisions internally and, if they are aggrieved about the outcome, to appeal to the Panel.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, if he will publish the relevant sections of ministerial or civil service guidance on the Radcliffe exclusion rule.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, if he will publish the relevant sections of ministerial or civil service guidance on the Radcliffe exclusion rule.
I refer the Hon. Member to my answer of 23 October 2017 [109149]. Considerations of exclusions are part of this process.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, with reference to the recommendations set out in the Report of the Committee of Privy Counsellors on Ministerial Memoirs chaired by Lord Radcliffe, published in 1976, if he will publish the relevant sections of his Department's (a) current and (b) previous guidance...
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, with reference to the recommendations set out in the Report of the Committee of Privy Counsellors on Ministerial Memoirs chaired by Lord Radcliffe, published in 1976, if he will publish the relevant sections of his Department's (a) current and (b) previous guidance...
Consideration is given to Ministerial memoirs on a case by case basis, taking into account the requirements of the Ministerial Code and the Radcliffe principles.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether a former Minister is entitled to publish a memoir about his stewardship in public office and to suppress public disclosure of his correspondence relating to the information and opinions contained in the memoir; and, if so, upon what basis.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether a former Minister is entitled to publish a memoir about his stewardship in public office and to suppress public disclosure of his correspondence relating to the information and opinions contained in the memoir; and, if so, upon what basis.
117A: After Clause 164, insert the following new Clause— "Police retention of photographs "(1) The Secretary of State must, as soon as possible and not later than three months after Royal Assent, amend Code D made under section 67(3) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (c. 60) (codes...
117A: After Clause 164, insert the following new Clause— "Police retention of photographs "(1) The Secretary of State must, as soon as possible and not later than three months after Royal Assent, amend Code D made under section 67(3) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (c. 60) (codes...
121: Schedule 20, page 218, line 18, at end insert— "( ) In Schedule 1, in paragraph 30 (date of taking effect of youth rehabilitation orders etc)— (a) in sub-paragraph (1)— (i) for "sub-paragraph (2)" substitute "sub-paragraphs (1A) and (2)", and (ii) omit "the day after", (b) after that sub-paragraph...
121: Schedule 20, page 218, line 18, at end insert— "( ) In Schedule 1, in paragraph 30 (date of taking effect of youth rehabilitation orders etc)— (a) in sub-paragraph (1)— (i) for "sub-paragraph (2)" substitute "sub-paragraphs (1A) and (2)", and (ii) omit "the day after", (b) after that sub-paragraph...
My Lords, I welcome the comments of the Minister. I, too, was concerned and had discussions with the noble and learned Lord, Lord Woolf. I agreed with the points that he made that the amendment would have an effect much wider than the one that the Minister outlined. We are...
My Lords, I welcome the comments of the Minister. I, too, was concerned and had discussions with the noble and learned Lord, Lord Woolf. I agreed with the points that he made that the amendment would have an effect much wider than the one that the Minister outlined. We are...
My Lords, I thank both noble Lords who have spoken. I say straight away to the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, that we need to legislate urgently on this and will bring back amendments at Third Reading, which I hope to share with noble Lords in good time. We will see...
My Lords, I thank both noble Lords who have spoken. I say straight away to the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, that we need to legislate urgently on this and will bring back amendments at Third Reading, which I hope to share with noble Lords in good time. We will see...
97: Clause 144, leave out Clause 144
97: Clause 144, leave out Clause 144
My Lords, together with other noble Lords whose names are appended to several amendments of the same kind, I tabled these amendments to remove Part 7 altogether from the Bill. We were not satisfied with the Government’s response to similar amendments that were tabled in Committee. We continued to be...
My Lords, together with other noble Lords whose names are appended to several amendments of the same kind, I tabled these amendments to remove Part 7 altogether from the Bill. We were not satisfied with the Government’s response to similar amendments that were tabled in Committee. We continued to be...
My Lords, my name is attached to the amendments, and I have tabled a couple of my own, Amendments 106A and 107A. I shall concentrate on why I consider that the Bill is not fit for purpose because Part 7 does not comply with the European Convention on Human Rights....
My Lords, my name is attached to the amendments, and I have tabled a couple of my own, Amendments 106A and 107A. I shall concentrate on why I consider that the Bill is not fit for purpose because Part 7 does not comply with the European Convention on Human Rights....
My Lords, I understand fully where the Government are coming from on this, and I am sympathetic to anything that tries to stop the distress caused by some of these publications to victims of crime and their close friends and families. As the Minister has already discovered, the problem is...
My Lords, I understand fully where the Government are coming from on this, and I am sympathetic to anything that tries to stop the distress caused by some of these publications to victims of crime and their close friends and families. As the Minister has already discovered, the problem is...
My Lords, I rise to support these amendments. I believe I am the only professional writer—that is, one who lives solely by her writing—to have spoken during the course of the Bill, and therefore what I have to say may be of some help. At Second Reading, my noble friend...
My Lords, I rise to support these amendments. I believe I am the only professional writer—that is, one who lives solely by her writing—to have spoken during the course of the Bill, and therefore what I have to say may be of some help. At Second Reading, my noble friend...
My Lords, with the leave of the House, I have every intention of withdrawing the amendment at the end of the debate, which I hope may be short or even non-existent. I shall try to explain in a few words why I intend to take this course. These amendments would...
My Lords, with the leave of the House, I have every intention of withdrawing the amendment at the end of the debate, which I hope may be short or even non-existent. I shall try to explain in a few words why I intend to take this course. These amendments would...
96: After Clause 143, insert the following new Clause— "Damages-based agreements (1) The Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 (c. 41) is amended as follows. (2) After section 58A insert— "58AA Damages-based agreements (1) A damages-based agreement which satisfies the conditions in subsection (3) is not unenforceable by reason only...
96: After Clause 143, insert the following new Clause— "Damages-based agreements (1) The Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 (c. 41) is amended as follows. (2) After section 58A insert— "58AA Damages-based agreements (1) A damages-based agreement which satisfies the conditions in subsection (3) is not unenforceable by reason only...
My Lords, I am most grateful to the Minister for the course that he has taken. We have shared the concerns to which he referred and consider that the proposals as currently drafted are wide and could capture areas which the Government would not wish to. The noble and learned...
My Lords, I am most grateful to the Minister for the course that he has taken. We have shared the concerns to which he referred and consider that the proposals as currently drafted are wide and could capture areas which the Government would not wish to. The noble and learned...
129: Schedule 22, page 232, line 30, at end insert— Amendment 129 agreed. Amendment 130 Moved by
129: Schedule 22, page 232, line 30, at end insert— Amendment 129 agreed. Amendment 130 Moved by