Skip to main content

1-20 of 109 results for subject:Jarvis

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, Amendment 65A is concerned with persons who worked for a company called Jarvis, which went into administration. Jarvis was one of the private companies that had subcontracts for renewal work with Network Rail; essentially this was the replacement of worn-out track and signals. This company was one of...

Member
Lord Dubs (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2014
Reference
751 cc299-300GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the amendment stems from the situation that arose on 31 March 2010 when Jarvis, a rail maintenance company, went into administration. The amendment is not intended to make any new demands but simply to close what I think was an unforeseen loophole in the Railways Act 1993. Schedule...

Member
Lord Dubs (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 February 2013
Reference
743 cc629-630
House
House of Lords

Adjournment debate on the future of rail engineering jobs.

Lead member
John McDonnell
Answering member
Norman Baker
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
526 c313-22
House
House of Commons

I have issues with Network Rail in my constituency, and I am interested to hear some of the information that the hon. Gentleman has given this evening, especially regarding the new chief executive. Does he think that the mindset of Network Rail has changed?

Member
Karl McCartney (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
526 c318
House
House of Commons

I think the experience of Jarvis has sent a message right the way through the industry that this is no longer a secure job. The message from what has happened to the ex-Jarvis workers is this: ““No matter how skilled you are, you will not necessarily be properly rewarded in...

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
526 c318
House
House of Commons

Surely that jobs summit, or meeting, must include provision for youngsters thinking of entering the industry to assure them that they will have a stable future and will be treated properly. The sort of casualisation that we currently have in the industry is undoubtedly a deterrent to entry.

Member
Ian Davidson (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
526 c317
House
House of Commons

It is a gap in the protection of workers' living standards, and this instance is a classic example of how people's futures have been damaged when they thought they were secure. The material that was provided to railway workers on privatisation of British Rail—the leaflets and documents that they received...

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
526 c317
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that it is a scandal that TUPE does not apply to pensions?

Member
Jim McGovern (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
526 c317
House
House of Commons

Certainly. I will come on to an idea that I have about that, which I think will interest the hon. Gentleman. To deal with the more immediate questions about learning the lessons of how this occurred, one of the concerns expressed was about the failure by Government to apply the...

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
526 c316-7
House
House of Commons

The reason why I raise the issue of agency workers in the rail industry is that such employment practice is becoming the norm for a number of companies. It is reflected throughout industry, and if it has now invaded the House. I find that disappointing. We as Members should take...

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
526 c315-6
House
House of Commons

I will explain, but first I will give another example of what I found among ex-Jarvis workers. We met workers who are now touring the country picking up days of work. These are skilled engineers, but some of them are unable to afford proper accommodation because they are now agency...

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
526 c314-5
House
House of Commons

Is my hon. Friend aware, as I am, having found out just 10 minutes ago, that there are people employed in this House—in the Palace of Westminster—through an agency that charges £20 per hour and pays them £6.15 per hour?

Member
Jim McGovern (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
526 c315
House
House of Commons

Is the hon. Gentleman suggesting that what is needed is for the Government to take a direct, hands-on approach to retaining skills and ensuring that those who have lost jobs get back into work again?

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
526 c316
House
House of Commons

I welcome the opportunity to debate in some detail the issues raised by the hon. Member for Hayes and Harlington (John McDonnell), who spoke with his usual integrity and humanity. The hon. Gentleman will appreciate that the Minister of State, who has responsibility for this matter, is not able to...

Member
Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
526 c318-22
House
House of Commons

The Minister mentioned billions of pounds of investment. Could he tell me, or will he meet me—

Member
Jim McGovern (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
526 c322
House
House of Commons

I hope that it has. With the new chief executive, there is the potential for more openness and engagement. The previous chief executive even refused to meet a number of us on one occasion, although some of the less senior staff did. I urge the Minister, as a matter of...

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
526 c318
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend on securing the debate and on his speech. Could he explain, if he knows, why the valuable and skilled workers of Jarvis were not taken into direct employment by Network Rail at the time of Jarvis's collapse? Clearly, all their work was done for Network...

Member
Jeremy Corbyn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
526 c314
House
House of Commons

I refer the House to my entry in the Register of Members' Interests. I have a railway estate in my constituency. It was a British Rail estate constructed to house railway workers. Although many of those properties have been sold off, it still predominantly houses railway workers, many of them...

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
526 c313-4
House
House of Commons

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on the railway industry.

Lead member
Baroness Clark of Kilwinning
Answering member
Theresa Villiers
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
19 October 2010
Reference
516 c181-204WH
House
House of Commons

I assure the hon. Lady that, whatever the length of the franchise, we will be pressing for the best deal for the taxpayer, including investment with longer franchises—whether they are for 10, 15 or 22.5 years.

Member
Theresa Villiers (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2010
Reference
516 c184WH
House
House of Commons