Skip to main content

1-20 of 144 results for subject:Metronet

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Transport Committee
Date
17 March 2010
Reference
HC 100 2009-10
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Transport (1) what assessment his Department has made of the performance of Metronet against its objectives since its transfer to Transport for London; and what recent discussions his Department has had over its long-term future;

Asked by
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
506 c1010W; 318148
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee of Public Accounts
Notes
See also NAO report HC 512 2008-09
Date
22 February 2010
Reference
HC 390 2009-10
House
House of Commons

The ex-Metronet investment programme covers the upgrade, maintenance and renewal of infrastructure on the Bakerloo, Central, Victoria, Waterloo and City and the sub-surface (Metropolitan, Circle, District, Hammersmith and City) lines. It will deliver nearly 30 per cent more capacity across the network, improving journey times and reliability. Following the administration...

Member
Lord Adonis (Labour)
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Written statements
Date
29 October 2009
Reference
713 c112-4WS
House
House of Lords

My right hon. and noble Friend the Secretary of State for Transport, Lord Adonis, has made the following ministerial statement:"The ex-Metronet investment programme covers the upgrade, maintenance and renewal of infrastructure on the Bakerloo, Central, Victoria, Waterloo and City and the sub-surface (Metropolitan, Circle, District, Hammersmith and City) lines. It...

Member
Lord Khan of Tooting (Labour)
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Written statements
Date
29 October 2009
Reference
498 c28-9WS
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee of Public Accounts
Date
19 October 2009
Reference
HC 1039-i 2008-09
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers
Notes
See also PAC report HC 390 2009-10
Date
4 June 2009
Reference
HC 512 2008-09
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assessment he has made of the effects of Metronet going into administration upon the delivery of its commitment under its public-private partnership contract.

Asked by
Theresa Villiers (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 November 2008
Reference
482 c646W; 231555
House
House of Commons

asked Her Majesty's Government:What outputs were expected to be delivered in the second phase of the London Underground Public Private Partnership when contracts were signed; and whether there is funding for these to be achieved.

Asked by
Baroness Valentine (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 June 2008
Reference
4004; 702 c267-9WA
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to the answer of 15 January 2008, Official Report, column 1088W, on Metronet, what the size of the loan from TfL to Metronet is.

Asked by
Mark Hoban (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 April 2008
Reference
474 c1020W; 196638
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what Metronet's weekly cost to the public purse has been since it went into administration; and from what budget the costs are met.

Asked by
Mark Hoban (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 March 2008
Reference
473 c531W;473 c528W; 189304
House
House of Commons

Supplementary estimates 2007-08. Second estimates day (part two). Motion that, for the year ending with 31st March 2008, for expenditure by the Department for Transport— (1) further resources, not exceeding £2,059,473,000, be authorised for use as set out in House of Commons Paper No. 273, (2) a further sum, not...

Lead member
Louise Ellman
Answering member
Baroness Winterton of Doncaster
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Estimates days
Date
10 March 2008
Reference
473 c85-117
House
House of Commons

indicated dissent.

Member
Justine Greening (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2008
Reference
473 c101
House
House of Commons

At the time of the PPP, I was on the board of Transport for London. I was a virulent opponent of the PPP, which I fought tooth and nail. I will not repeat the comments that have been made already, but I will try to add to them, because the...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2008
Reference
473 c101
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady is suggesting that the Government had weak negotiators on their side. If they had had tough negotiators, as they should have, would the privateers not have walked away because they would not have been able to make any money and the risk would have transferred to them?...

Member
Kelvin Hopkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2008
Reference
473 c102
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady shakes her head, but I stood on a platform day in, day out with the Conservative mayoral candidate in many venues; I can say that the Conservative party was seeking total privatisation as an answer. Ken Livingstone had in this House voted twice for the PPP; only...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2008
Reference
473 c101-2
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Gentleman agree with my right hon. Friend the Member for Greenwich and Woolwich (Mr. Raynsford) that no lessons need to be learned about the supervision of the Tube Lines contract from this spectacular collapse, although the company's only exposure is the £180 million of equity it has...

Member
David Leslie Taylor (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2008
Reference
473 c89
House
House of Commons

I fear the worst when I hear the evidence from East Putney. I hope the Minister will tell us that that is not the case.

Member
Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2008
Reference
473 c89
House
House of Commons

In the light of the powerful analysis in the report, which I warmly welcome having been a long-term and trenchant critic of PPP and its cousin, the private finance initiative, does my hon. Friend feel that there is a serious risk that, at some time in the short to medium...

Member
David Leslie Taylor (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2008
Reference
473 c86-7
House
House of Commons

I share my hon. Friend's concerns. The Committee's recommends constant monitoring and that the requirement for annual reviews be followed to ensure public value for the money spent.

Member
Louise Ellman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2008
Reference
473 c87
House
House of Commons