1-18 of 18 results for subject:Newton-le-Willows
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.252 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Newton-le-Willows
- We searched for
- subject_t:Newton-le-Willows OR subject_ses:514745
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, with reference to paragraph 5.140 of the Spring Budget 2024, HC 560, when plans to publish details of funding for Newton-Le-Willows.
To ask the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, with reference to paragraph 5.140 of the Spring Budget 2024, HC 560, when plans to publish details of funding for Newton-Le-Willows.
The Prime Minister’s Long Term Plan for Towns will see up to £20 million of funding and support from the Government for Newton-Le-Willows over the next decade. I wrote to the Member for St Helen’s North and the Leader and Chief Executive of St Helen’s Borough Council on 19 March 2024 setting out next steps for developing the Long Term Plan for their town. This included details of the funding that will be provided for Newton-Le-Willows.
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, for what reason he called in the planning application for the Parkside development in Newton-le-Willows; and if he will publish the documentation his Department holds in relation to that decision.
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, for what reason he called in the planning application for the Parkside development in Newton-le-Willows; and if he will publish the documentation his Department holds in relation to that decision.
This planning application (P/2018/0048/OUP) for the construction of up to 92,900 m2 of employment floorspace (Use Class B8 with ancillary B1(a)) and associated servicing and infrastructure on the site of former Parkside Colliery in Newton-le-Willows, was called-in by the Secretary of State on 21 May 2020. The reasons for the call in are as set out in the letter, and I am now arranging for a copy to be sent to the Honourable Member for St Helens North. It would not be appropriate for me to add anything.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, when he plans to announce a decision on the future of Newton-le-Willows job centre.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, when he plans to announce a decision on the future of Newton-le-Willows job centre.
The Department intends to confirm its plans for the DWP estate, including Newton-le-Willows Jobcentre, soon and will make a statement in due course.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many staff of his Department are employed at Newton-le-Willows Jobcentre.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many staff of his Department are employed at Newton-le-Willows Jobcentre.
At 31 December 2016 the Department for Work and Pensions employed four staff at Newton-le-Willows Jobcentre.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people in which postcodes are covered by Newton-le-Willows Jobcentre.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people in which postcodes are covered by Newton-le-Willows Jobcentre.
Newton le Willows covers the WA12 postcode area. There are currently 213 JSA claimants, 105 ESA, 71 IS and 185 UC claimants on caseloads at this office.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people have accessed services at Newton-le-Willows Jobcentre in each year since 2010.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people have accessed services at Newton-le-Willows Jobcentre in each year since 2010.
We are unable to provide exact figures of people who have accessed services at Newton-le-Willows Jobcentre, as the extent to which they are required to attend will vary, depending upon the specific requirements of the benefit they receive. The purpose of the equality analysis is to help establish how many people are likely to be affected by the proposal.
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, how many miners in Newton-le-Willows have received (a) offers and (b) final offer settlements for their white finger and pneumoconiosis claims. - Inc table.
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, how many miners in Newton-le-Willows have received (a) offers and (b) final offer settlements for their white finger and pneumoconiosis claims. - Inc table.
That this House salutes the strength and fortitude of Mrs Sylvia Pye and her courageous band of supporters who, one year ago on 18th January 1993, established the Women Against Pit Closures camp at Parkside Colliery, Newton-le-Willows; notes with pride that the camp has been occupied by women volunteers for 24 hours a day, every day, for the past 12 months; believes that their continuous presence has ensured that the shafts and machinery have remained intact and that coal production at Parkside Colliery could be resumed in a matter of days; therefore calls upon Her Majesty's Government to end its vendetta against Britain's miners and the nationalised coal industry, abandon its vicious and unacceptable Coal Industry Bill and restore collieries like Parkside, with their heroic women defenders, to full production.
That this House salutes the strength and fortitude of Mrs Sylvia Pye and her courageous band of supporters who, one year ago on 18th January 1993, established the Women Against Pit Closures camp at Parkside Colliery, Newton-le-Willows; notes with pride that the camp has been occupied by women volunteers for...
Adjournment debate on Parkside & rest of the ten collieries remaining on closure list.
Adjournment debate on Parkside & rest of the ten collieries remaining on closure list.
What have been the profits and losses at Parkside Colliery over each of the past six years. - A matter for British Coal.
What have been the profits and losses at Parkside Colliery over each of the past six years. - A matter for British Coal.
That this House condemns British Coal for precipately ending coal mining operations at Parkside Colliery on Friday 23rd October, withoput any consultation with the workforce; notes that Parkside Colliery made profits of ??5,093,000 in 1987-88, ??3,258,000 in 1988-89, ??1,729,000 in 1989-90, ??5,074,000 in 1990-91 and ??2,874,000 in 1991-92; further notes that a new coal seam recently put into production, with ??6,500,000 worth of new coal producing machinery, was performing well and expected to produce substantial profits; and demands that British Coal restart production immediately at the colliery until their claim that the colliery is making substantial losses can be examined by the Trade and Industry Select Committee.
That this House condemns British Coal for precipately ending coal mining operations at Parkside Colliery on Friday 23rd October, withoput any consultation with the workforce; notes that Parkside Colliery made profits of ??5,093,000 in 1987-88, ??3,258,000 in 1988-89, ??1,729,000 in 1989-90, ??5,074,000 in 1990-91 and ??2,874,000 in 1991-92; further notes...
That this House notes with dismay and anger that if coal production is not resumed forthwith at Parkside Colliery the recently installed ??6, 500,000 worth of new coal producing machinery, together with millions of pounds worth of other material and machinery will be left to rot in the sealed up pit and, additionally, that Parkside's estimated 50 million tonnes of coal reserves will be lost to the nation forever.
That this House notes with dismay and anger that if coal production is not resumed forthwith at Parkside Colliery the recently installed ??6, 500,000 worth of new coal producing machinery, together with millions of pounds worth of other material and machinery will be left to rot in the sealed up...
That this House, noting the statement of the Secretary of State for Wales in the debate on pit closures on Wednesday 21st October concerning the pits remaining on British Coal's hit list for closure, where he said 'Let me make matters absolutely clear about the 10 pits. British Coal is under a statutory duty to consult on those closures. It must be a genuine consultation ... British Coal will have to demonstrate ... that the criteria have been met, because, under the legislation, it not only has to give reasons for closure, but it must prove that the consultation is a genuine one' (column 526), and British Coal's ending of coal mining operations at Parkside Colliery on Friday 23rd October without any consultation whatsoever with the workforce or their trade unions; and calls upon the Secretary of State to either repudiate British Coal or to resign his office.
That this House, noting the statement of the Secretary of State for Wales in the debate on pit closures on Wednesday 21st October concerning the pits remaining on British Coal's hit list for closure, where he said 'Let me make matters absolutely clear about the 10 pits. British Coal is...
Motion under Standing Order No. 20. Speaker declined to put the application to the House.
Motion under Standing Order No. 20. Speaker declined to put the application to the House.