Skip to main content

1-20 of 53 results for subject:Ormskirk

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Thank you, Mr Speaker; I am delighted to take up this place. People in West Lancashire are concerned about the potential relocation of the children’s accident and emergency department at Ormskirk following the joint integrated care board committee’s “Shaping Care Together” consultation. Folk, and I, want a co-located children and...

Member
Ashley Dalton (Labour)
Type
Business questions
Date
5 March 2026
Reference
781 c959
House
House of Commons

First, I thank my hon. Friend for her commitment and contribution to the Government. I am sorry that she has left government, but I wish her well in every sense. Her work on the national cancer plan will save lives and transform care—and not every Minister can say that their...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2026
Reference
781 c960
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether there is any mechanism by which the Lancashire justice area management team can seek to reverse the decision to allocate Skelmersdale criminal cases to Wigan Magistrates' Court.

Asked by
Rosie Cooper (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 March 2016
Reference
29145
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the reasons were for his decision to allocate Skelmersdale criminal cases to Wigan Magistrates' Court after the decision to close Ormskirk Magistrates' Court; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Rosie Cooper (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 March 2016
Reference
29146
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether he has received any representations from senior officials in HM Courts and Tribunals Service seeking to reverse the decision for Skelmersdale criminal cases to be heard at Wigan Magistrates' Court.

Asked by
Rosie Cooper (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 March 2016
Reference
29142
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to the proposals on the provision of court and tribunal estate in England and Wales published by his Department on 16 July 2015, when the decision was taken to include Ormskirk Magistrates' Court and Family Court in the list of...

Asked by
Rosie Cooper (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 November 2015
Reference
14929
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many cases from Ormskirk have been listed at Ormskirk Youth Court on each date of sitting since the closure of youth courts in south-west Lancashire on 1 July; and how many cases from Chorley or South Ribble have been listed each day for the...

Asked by
Lord Hoyle (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 November 2012
Reference
740 c321WA; HL3051
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, since the closure of the youth courts in south-west Lancashire on 1 July, how many cases from the south Ribble and Chorley areas have been heard at (1) Preston, and (2) Ormskirk, youth courts.[HL3030]

Asked by
Lord Hoyle (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 November 2012
Reference
740 c321WA; HL3030
House
House of Lords
My right hon. Friend has spoken often of his commitment to improving patients’ access to NHS services. Does he have any further information on plans to develop services on the Ormskirk site of the Southport and Ormskirk hospital, with special regard to the urgent care centre and in recognising the benefit of providing the right local services in local settings?
Asked by
Rosie Cooper (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
4 July 2007
Reference
462 c957-8
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for the hon. Lady’s intervention and her clarification of the Government’s promises. Obviously, I wish to see them firmed up and delivered. Clearly, the effects of there not being development can sometimes be negative. I recall going to the Government office for the north-west in the company...

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2007
Reference
460 c57WH
House
House of Commons

I apologise in advance for spoiling your lunch, Mr. Conway, and probably that of the Minister. It will not displease me if we do not take the full allotted time, but get straight to the point. I am glad to see the Minister here, because our careers have crossed in...

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2007
Reference
460 c54-6WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman rightly says that I am more hopeful than he. That is because we have secured a promise from the Minister that sub-regional priorities will be considered again in 2009. The county council should be congratulated on working with us and ensuring that the scheme will go ahead...

Member
Rosie Cooper (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2007
Reference
460 c56WH
House
House of Commons

That is certainly an issue, and I shall come to it in a moment. However, my remarks highlight the rationale of the regional funding allocation process. To be fair to the hon. Gentleman, he acknowledged that it is an improvement on the previous arrangement. It is more transparent. The way...

Member
Stephen Ladyman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2007
Reference
460 c58-60WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Member for Southport (Dr. Pugh) on securing the debate. He and my hon. Friend the Member for West Lancashire (Rosie Cooper) have made a powerful case for the Ormskirk bypass, as part of the hon. Gentleman’s more general comments about the regional funding allocation process. The...

Member
Stephen Ladyman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2007
Reference
460 c57-8WH
House
House of Commons

I will certainly not argue with the Minister’s well informed statistics, but he would probably acknowledge that a large percentage of that money has been spent on a small number of large projects, so some of the smaller projects might have to wait in a much longer queue.

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2007
Reference
460 c58WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend has given us three options. The first was this Government or the next giving more money. The second was essentially that we need to get some money set aside. I assure him that we are putting a great deal of pressure on the regional people and making...

Member
Rosie Cooper (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2007
Reference
460 c62WH
House
House of Commons

I never had any thought that my hon. Friend would give up on the Ormskirk bypass. I am sure that her constituents have no thought of that either. She and the hon. Member for Southport are doing absolutely the right thing—making the case locally either for money to be set...

Member
Stephen Ladyman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2007
Reference
460 c62WH
House
House of Commons

When we will be given some indication of when we will know about the priorities that my hon. Friend mentioned? In the previous round, the big city regions grabbed the funding and had their paws on the major part of it. Sub-regional priorities were way down the list. The Ormskirk...

Member
Rosie Cooper (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2007
Reference
460 c60WH
House
House of Commons

That is not quite what I am saying. The consultation that we have been doing in recent months and are now analysing was about how the regional funding allocation process works. Our understanding in the Department for Transport was that people out in the regions understood that they could decide...

Member
Stephen Ladyman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2007
Reference
460 c60-1WH
House
House of Commons

The Minister is being very constructive and helpful, and he is giving us some hints as to how we can make progress. However, there is a fundamental problem. To win the argument we have to consider objective criteria, and one that will come up every time is whether a scheme...

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2007
Reference
460 c61-2WH
House
House of Commons