asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Answer by Lord Rooker on 28 March 2007 (Official Report, col. 1645) and the Written Answer by Lord Rooker on 2 April (WA 184), whether, in the light of the United States bankruptcy court's approval of the agreement designating Brofiscin Quarry as a legacy...

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Answer by Lord Rooker on 28 March 2007 (Official Report, col. 1645) and the Written Answer by Lord Rooker on 2 April (WA 184), whether, in the light of the United States bankruptcy court's approval of the agreement designating Brofiscin Quarry as a legacy...

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Answer by Lord Rooker on 28 March 2007 (Official Report, col. 1645), whether the Environment Agency Wales has obtained clarification of the liabilities of Solutia Incorporated or Monsanto under Part IIA of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 in relation to pollution at Brofiscin Quarry;...

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Answer by Lord Rooker on 28 March 2007 (Official Report, col. 1645), whether the Environment Agency Wales has obtained clarification of the liabilities of Solutia Incorporated or Monsanto under Part IIA of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 in relation to pollution at Brofiscin Quarry;...

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Lord Rooker on 8 May (WA 101), what was the relevant information provided to Lovells in order that it could carry out the instructions of the Environment Agency Wales.

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Lord Rooker on 8 May (WA 101), what was the relevant information provided to Lovells in order that it could carry out the instructions of the Environment Agency Wales.

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Lord Rooker on 10 March (WA 217), whether any copies of original documentation supplied by Mr Douglas Gowan were seen by Lovells.

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Lord Rooker on 10 March (WA 217), whether any copies of original documentation supplied by Mr Douglas Gowan were seen by Lovells.

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Lord Rooker on 10 March (WA 217), upon what basis Lovells were expected to advise the Environment Agency Wales in their claim for remediation of Brofiscin Quarry against Solutia Incorporated in the United States bankruptcy courts when they had not met...

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Lord Rooker on 10 March (WA 217), upon what basis Lovells were expected to advise the Environment Agency Wales in their claim for remediation of Brofiscin Quarry against Solutia Incorporated in the United States bankruptcy courts when they had not met...

asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the total cost to date of legal advice and legal actions by the Environment Agency and the Environment Agency Wales in their pursuit of legal action against Monsanto and Solutia Inc in the United Kingdom and the United States for remediation of Brofiscin quarry and...

asked Her Majesty's Government:What is the total cost to date of legal advice and legal actions by the Environment Agency and the Environment Agency Wales in their pursuit of legal action against Monsanto and Solutia Inc in the United Kingdom and the United States for remediation of Brofiscin quarry and...

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether any of the original witness statements and evidentiary materials provided to the chairman of the Environment Agency and to officials of Environment Agency Wales by Mr Douglas Gowan were sent to the firm of Lovells in the United States as part of the evidence for remediation...

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether any of the original witness statements and evidentiary materials provided to the chairman of the Environment Agency and to officials of Environment Agency Wales by Mr Douglas Gowan were sent to the firm of Lovells in the United States as part of the evidence for remediation...

asked Her Majesty's Government:Why no proofs of claim against Solutia Inc were ever filed by lawyers representing United Kingdom interests in the United States Bankruptcy Court on the basis of evidence that was available in 2004.

asked Her Majesty's Government:Why no proofs of claim against Solutia Inc were ever filed by lawyers representing United Kingdom interests in the United States Bankruptcy Court on the basis of evidence that was available in 2004.

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the Environment Agency or the Environment Agency Wales were aware that Solutia Inc had informed the United States Bankruptcy Court that the presence of certain chemical contaminants found in waste disposal sites would be a proof of Monsanto involvement, and that these chemicals were identified by...

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the Environment Agency or the Environment Agency Wales were aware that Solutia Inc had informed the United States Bankruptcy Court that the presence of certain chemical contaminants found in waste disposal sites would be a proof of Monsanto involvement, and that these chemicals were identified by...

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Answer by Lord Rooker on 28 March (Official Report, cols. 1644–7), on what date in May 2006 the ““protection of reservation rights”” was filed at the Solutia Incorporated bankruptcy proceedings in the United States; what form the filing took; and what was the outcome.

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Answer by Lord Rooker on 28 March (Official Report, cols. 1644–7), on what date in May 2006 the ““protection of reservation rights”” was filed at the Solutia Incorporated bankruptcy proceedings in the United States; what form the filing took; and what was the outcome.