Skip to main content

1-20 of 9,234 results for subject:Strikes

Type

-
Early day motions (71)
+ Legislation (19) + Acts (3)
-
Public acts (3)
+ Bills (6) + Public bills (6)
-
Government bills (3)
+ Private members' bills (3)
-
Ballot bills (1)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (10) + Statutory instruments (10)
-
Regulatory reform orders (1)
+ Members' contributions (8,008)
-
Business questions (86)
-
Maiden speeches (4)
-
Oral answers to questions (433)
-
Oral question time interventions (14)
+ Oral questions (446)
-
Prime Minister's questions (112)
-
Topical questions (42)
-
Points of order (3)
-
Proceeding contributions (7,110)
+ Parliamentary committees (100) + Committee proceedings (69)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (16)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (6)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (20)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (18)
-
Select Committee reports (9)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (4)
-
Select Committee written evidence (23)
+ Parliamentary papers (92)
-
Annual reports (1)
-
Consultation papers (4)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (2)
-
Deposited papers (44)
-
House of Commons papers (41)
-
House of Lords papers (5)
-
Impact assessments (4)
-
Unprinted papers (3)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (282) + Debates (148)
-
Adjournment debates (9)
-
Backbench debates (2)
+ Committee proceedings (69)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (16)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (6)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (20)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (18)
-
e-petition debates (1)
+ Legislative debates (101)
-
Debates on bills (88)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (13)
+ Monarch's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (1)
-
Opposition days (5)
-
Questions for short debate (2)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
-
Private notice questions (7)
+ Statements (106) + Oral statements (54)
-
Business statements (2)
-
Lord Speaker's statements (2)
-
Ministerial statements (49)
-
Speaker's statements (1)
-
Written statements (52)
-
Urgent questions (15)
+ Written corrections (2)
-
Ministerial corrections (2)
+ Parliamentary questions (1,305)
-
Business questions (86)
+ Oral questions (446)
-
Prime Minister's questions (112)
-
Topical questions (42)
-
Private notice questions (7)
-
Urgent questions (15)
-
Written questions (751)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Research briefings (22) + Commons Briefing papers (15)
-
Briefing papers on bills (3)
-
Commons Debate packs (3)
+ Lords Briefing packs (1)
-
Lords Briefing packs - Debates (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (3)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (3)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Just before my noble friend sits down, may I add to the point he has made? The noble Lord, Lord Faulkner of Worcester, as did the noble Lord, Lord Tunnicliffe, illustrated one of the points when he talked about what is called abstraction of revenue from other operators against the...

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 c303GC
House
House of Lords

It is one of many.

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 c303GC
House
House of Lords

It will be exacerbated once all the passenger rail services that were under private operators are owned and operated by GBR. That conflict becomes worse, not better.

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 c303GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend Lord Faulkner for supporting the premise that we need a directing mind for the railway. I hope I will not prolong the previous discussion but will say only this: only GBR, as the principal operator, has the expertise to decide how...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 cc303-5GC
House
House of Lords

Is the Minister aware that the Cotswold Line Promotion Group, of which I have the honour to be president, at its own expense produces a timetable for the route between Paddington, Oxford, Worcester and Hereford? It is produced in co-operation with Great Western Railway, the present operator, and we hope...

Member
Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 c305GC
House
House of Lords

I am delighted to hear it. One of the things we need for the future is for as many people as possible to understand the totality of passenger train services on the network, whoever operates them, in order to sustain the maximum number of passengers in order to justify a...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 c305GC
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister leaves the subject, I am glad that he is still working on those things that are supposed to be available but are very difficult to find. Does he recognise that, in addition to what can be made available online, it is beneficial, as the noble Lord, Lord...

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 c305GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord hits on a very useful topic. We are trying to—and will—remove the massive inconsistency in information between different train operators on the network. I sympathise very much with his view. If you tried to collect published information from all the train operators in Britain, it would come...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 cc305-6GC
House
House of Lords

Will the Minister acknowledge that “have regard to” is the lowest form of legal obligation that can be imposed on a public body? Those of us with local government experience have come across language such as, “in general conformity with”, which is higher; “in conformity”, which is even higher; and...

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 c306GC
House
House of Lords

The consideration given to freight and indeed other sorts of services on the network will differ in accordance with time and location. GBR has a pretty serious job to do, but the reason why the freight growth target is enshrined in this legislation more than once is to emphasise the...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 cc306-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, again, I am grateful to the Minister for his responses, in particular, his helpful clarification that the reference at Clause 60(4)(b) to “other railway passenger services” includes heritage charter operators. I associate myself with my noble friend Lord Moylan’s remark that “have regard to” is not a binding...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 c307GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Moylan

240: Clause 64, page 36, line 31, leave out paragraph (b)

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment would remove the requirement for GBR to charge in relation to trains which are planned to use GBR infrastructure but do not operate, or do not operate in full.

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 c307GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are trespassing into what might be slight newer ground, having so far been discussing broadly similar subjects in relation to access. Some of these amendments might appear a little trivial—or, at least, technical—but they are of importance to the freight industry, in particular, and to other users...

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 cc307-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Moylan, for introducing this group of amendments, some of which are in my name. It is particularly relevant when you look at the way in which freight trains operate, how much they pay and what happens when things go wrong....

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 cc309-310GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will intervene briefly on this group of amendments, which deals with Clause 64 on the charging scheme. Behind my noble friend Lord Moylan’s amendments and the concerns we have just heard from the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, is a concern that open access and freight operators might...

Member
Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 cc310-1GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have some questions in this section, as my noble friend Lord Young had. Like him, I broadly agree with the thrust of my noble friend Lord Moylan’s amendments; they are very helpful, and they allow us to have a discussion about Clause 64.

I have two specific questions....

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 cc311-2GC
House
House of Lords

Does the noble Lord, Lord Harper, have a view on how the compensation charges that we discussed earlier would apply to GBR services and the fares and charges that they may or may not be making? Is there an imbalance there or is it something that will be resolved?

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 c312GC
House
House of Lords

It is a fair question. People listening to this from outside might ask, given that GBR runs the infrastructure and services, what the point is of one bit of the business charging another bit. However, if you are going to make economically rational decisions, it is quite important that the...

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 c313GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with the questions that have been asked and look forward to the Minister’s answers. I am here to explore the business impact of the Bill outside passenger services, and I will speak later on open access. Having seen this clause, I am interested in the impact...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 c313GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, some important questions have been raised to fully understand access charging, which is a concern to the wider sector. Many of them were set out by the noble Lord, Lord Young

of Cookham. Charges need to be transparent and fair to providers. They need to cover the true...

Member
Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
860 c313GC
House
House of Lords