Written question asked by Countess of Mar (Crossbench), in the House of Lords. It was due for an answer on Thursday, 24 February 2005. It was answered by Lord Whitty (Labour) on Thursday, 24 February 2005.

---

Untitled Written question

Question

Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Whitty on 4 February 2005, 669 c68-9WA, on what evidence (a) human toxicology data; (b) non-human mammalian toxicological data; (c) general practitioner medical records; (d) pesticide company doctor medical records; (e) Health and Safety Executive Employment Medical Advisory Service medical records; (f) information provided by the National Poisons Information Service; (g) data from biochemical investigation tests; and (h) other information the Pesticides Safety Directorate has concluded that "62 incidents ... did not demonstrate a causal link between the pesticide and symptoms described". [HL 1364].

---

Secondary information

Type

Written question

Reference

HL 1364; 669 c233WA

Session

2004-05

Subjects

Animals Companies Evidence Health hazards Health and Safety Executive General practitioners Medical records Pesticides Pesticides Safety Directorate National Poisons Information Service Biochemistry