Oral answer to question provided on Tuesday, 20 December 2011 in the House of Commons, by Dominic Grieve (Conservative), Attorney General.
Babar Ahmad
- Answer
-
I have to try to work out where the right hon. Gentleman's question is coming from, but the main complaint about the Babar Ahmad case is the length of time that it is taking. As he will be aware, proceedings started on 5 August 2004, and in this country proceedings, including the refusal of leave to appeal to the House of Lords, were completed on 6 June 2007. The problems and delays since then are in fact due to the European Court of Human Rights, and that ties in with my answers to earlier questions about the inordinate length of time that it takes to bring such cases to the European Court of Human Rights—with consequences, in the case of Babar Ahmad, that are plainly undesirable.
- Question
- What role can the Attorney-General and the Government play in ensuring that there are no more Babar Ahmad cases?
Secondary information
- Type
- Oral answer to question
- Reference
- 537 c1195-6
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Extradition USA Ahmad, Babar
- Link
- View this Oral answer to question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2014-09-01 20:36:13 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1662112/answer
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1662112/answer
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1662112/answer