Written question asked by Bill O'Brien (Labour), in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Wednesday, 1 May 1991. It was answered by Robert Key (Conservative) on Wednesday, 1 May 1991 on behalf of the Department of the Environment.
Written question
- Question
- If he will break down the number of projects not approved for the 1991-92 financial year (a) numerically and (b) by cash value for the urban programme in (i) Rochdale, (ii) Rotherham, (iii) St. Helens, (iv) Sandwell, (v) Sefton and (vi) Sheffield; and what is the percentage of projects not approved for the financial year 1991-92 relating to (1) ethnic minority projects, (2) projects relating to disability, (3) economic developments and (4) the environment. - Will write. (Holding answer 22.4.91).
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 190 c222W;190 c224W
- Session
- 1990-91
- Subjects
- Disability Finance Environment protection Ethnic groups Regional planning and development Urban areas Sheffield Rotherham Rochdale Sefton St Helens Sandwell
- Contains statistics
- Yes
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2019-11-14 23:08:27 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_182374
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_182374
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_182374