Written question asked by Gordon Prentice (Labour), in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Friday, 2 February 1996. It was answered by Jonathan Evans (Conservative) on Friday, 2 February 1996 on behalf of the Lord Chancellor's Department.

---

Lord Chancellors Dept

Question

Pursuant to his Answer of 18th January, c674W, if he will seek reasons from the Law Commission and Land Registry, beyond those which appear in the Law Commissions Report 235, as to why they did not feel able to recommend the extension of section 123 of the Land Registration Act 1925 to conveyances which do not accompany a transfer of the beneficial interest in the land.

---

Secondary information

Type

Written question

Reference

270 c951-2W; 12333

Session

1995-96

Subjects

Conveyancing Land Registration

Legislation

Land Registration Act 1925