Written question asked by Ken Livingstone (Labour), in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Friday, 24 June 1994. It was answered by Jeremy Hanley (Conservative) on Friday, 24 June 1994 on behalf of the Ministry of Defence.
Ministry of Defence;Chemical and Biological Defence Establishment
- Question
- Pursuant to 236 c306W, what was conclusion of Biotechnology Committees report into implications of biotechnology for defence; how many members were then serving on Biotechnology Committee; how many of them were academics; if they were given access to chemical and biological defence establishment at Porton Down; and to place copy of report in Library. - Includes text of letter from Dr G Pearson of CBDE. (Printed with holding answer in daily par t at 245 c210-2W).
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 245 c372W;245 c370W
- Session
- 1993-94
- Subjects
- Chemical and biological warfare Defence Chemical weapons Biological weapons Biotechnology Public appointments Research Testing Chemical and Biological Defence Establishment Biotechnology Directorate
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2022-02-10 15:19:54 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_347937
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_347937
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_347937