Skip to main content

Written question asked by James Paice (Conservative) on Thursday, 29 January 1998, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Thursday, 12 February 1998. It was answered by Lord Darling of Roulanish (Labour) on Thursday, 12 February 1998 on behalf of the Treasury.


Treasury

Question
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, What representations he has received about the tax treatment of compensation for former tenants of the Land Settlement Associations. (Failed OPQ)
Answer

Mr. Hayes: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what representations he has received about the tax treatment of compensation awarded to former tenants of the land settlement associations. [27224] Mr. Paice: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what representations he has received about the tax treatment of compensation for former tenants of the land settlement associations. [27236] Mr. Darling: Representations have been made querying the raising of a tax charge in respect of out of court compensation paid by MAFF to a number of former tenants of the Land Settlement Association. It has been explained that under tax law, compensation received for a capital loss, or for personal hardship, is not liable to income tax, but where a payment is made to compensate a restriction of trading opportunities, or to fill a hole in profits, it is taxable as trading income. And that the nature of a compensation payment in an out of court settlement is decided by the evidence of the claims for compensation. Just how much of a compensation payment received is for restricted trading opportunities, capital loss, or personal hardship, is a matter for agreement between the recipient and the Inspector of Taxes.


Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
27236; 306 c378-9W
Session
1997-98
Question not reached
Yes
Subjects
Compensation Taxation Tenants Smallholdings Land Settlement Association Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food