Written question asked by Paul Goggins (Labour) on Monday, 17 July 2000, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Tuesday, 18 July 2000. It was answered by Ross Cranston (Labour) on Tuesday, 18 July 2000 on behalf of the Solicitor General.
Solicitor-General
- Question
- To ask the Solicitor General, if he will make a statement concerning the possible prosecution of Roisin McAliskey. - Inc ref to 308 c133W, 10 March 1998 and 308 c742W, 20 March 1998.
- Answer
-
Mr. Goggins: To ask the Solicitor-General if he will make a statement concerning the possible prosecution of Roisin McAliskey. [131514] The Solicitor-General: Further to the statement of the Home Secretary on 10 March 1998, Official Report, column 133W, that he would not order the extradition of Roisin McAliskey to Germany, the Crown Prosecution Service, in accordance with this country's obligations under Article 7 of the European Convention on the Suppression of Terrorism, has considered whether to prosecute Roisin McAliskey in this country for the offences allegedly committed in Germany in relation to the Osnabruk bombing of 28 June 1996. The test applied by the Crown Prosecution Service is the test set out in the Code for Crown Prosecutors that applies to all prosecution will be commenced or proceeded with only if there is sufficient evidence to afford a realistic prospect of conviction and that prosecution is in the public interest. The Crown Prosecution Service, having taken the advice of Senior Treasury Counsel, has concluded that there is not a realistic prospect of convicting Miss McAliskey for any offence arising out of the Osnabruk bombing. It has reached that conclusion having taken into account the available evidence and the likely result of any argument that may be put forward by Miss McAliskey that to prosecute her now would be an abuse of process. The Law Officers have been consulted and we agree with the conclusion reached by the Crown Prosecution Service. It is not usual for the Law Officers to make announcements concerning consideration of individual cases. In this instance, the Home Secretary, in a written reply, 20 March 1998, Official Report, column 742W, said that this matter would be considered for prosecution in the United Kingdom. It is right that the House should be informed of the outcome of those considerations.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 354 c124-5W; 131514
- Session
- 1999-00
- Subjects
- Extradition Germany Prosecutions Terrorism McAliskey, Roisin
- Link
- View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2016-10-07 09:04:04 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_609415
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_609415
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_609415