Written question asked by Austin Mitchell (Labour) on Tuesday, 19 November 2002, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Tuesday, 26 November 2002. It was answered by Baroness Primarolo (Labour) on Tuesday, 26 November 2002 on behalf of the Treasury.
Treasury
- Question
- To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether any of the Customs and Excise and Inland Revenue buildings sold to Mapeley or Mapeley Steps were liable for stamp duty; whether stamp duty was paid; and on how many of the buildings. - Including ref to 7 November 2002, 392 c747W.
- Answer
-
Mr. Austin Mitchell: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether any of the Customs and Excise and Inland Revenue buildings sold to Mapeley or Mapeley Steps were liable for stamp duty; whether stamp duty was paid; and on how many of the buildings. [82764] Dawn Primarolo: I have nothing to add to the reply I gave the hon. Gentleman on 7 November 2002, Official Report, column 747W.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 395 c155W; 82764
- Session
- 2002-03
- Subjects
- Customs and Excise Buildings Inland Revenue Property transfer Taxation Stamp duties Mapeley Strategic transfer of estate to the private sector
- Link
- View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2016-10-06 09:34:45 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_716239
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_716239
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_716239