Written question asked by David Laws (Liberal Democrat) on Friday, 25 January 2002, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Tuesday, 5 February 2002. It was answered by Ruth Kelly (Labour) on Tuesday, 5 February 2002 on behalf of the Treasury.
Treasury
- Question
- To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, for what reasons UK productivity growth was described as lacklustre in the slides presented by Mr Gus O'Donnell at a seminar with students on 30th November 2001; and if he will make a statement.
- Answer
-
Mr. Laws: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer for what reasons UK productivity growth was described as lacklustre in the slides presented by Mr. Gus O'Donnell at a seminar with students on 30 November 2001; and if he will make a statement. [31661] Ruth Kelly: The slide to which the hon. Gentleman refers shows a quadrant of possible risks to the Treasury's central forecast for the UK economy in 2002, and the reference to productivity growth appeared only in the worst case scenario.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 31661; 379 c852W;379 c848W
- Session
- 2001-02
- Subjects
- Economic situation Productivity O'Donnell, Lord
- Link
- View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2016-10-07 19:20:12 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_776508
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_776508
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_776508