Skip to main content

Written question asked by Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat) on Tuesday, 22 January 2002, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Thursday, 31 January 2002. It was answered by Lord Moonie (Labour) on Thursday, 31 January 2002 on behalf of the Ministry of Defence.


Ministry of Defence

Question
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will make a statement on spending within the budget on the Nimrod MRA4 programme; how much liquidated damages the MoD is seeking for the project's delay from BAe; what alternative means of delivering MRA4 capability are being considered; and how much longer the project is expected to be delayed. - Inc ref to the Ministry of Defence's Major Road Project Report 2001 under section 2 - "Project Costs".
Answer

Mr. Hancock: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on spending within the budget on the Nimrod MRA4 programme; how much liquidated damages the MOD is seeking for the project's delay from BAE; what alternative means of delivering MRA4 capability are being considered; and how much longer the project is expected to be delayed. [30285] Dr. Moonie: The budgetary data being sought by the hon. Member are contained in the Ministry of Defence's Major Road Project Report 2001 under section 2-- "Project Costs", including information on the forecast receipt of liquidated damages. As to the question of further delay, the Major Project report also noted that the Department was engaged in discussions with BAE Systems over the incremental delivery of the MRA4 capability. These discussions are close to being finalised with the company. Until the negotiations have been completed, it will not be possible to be definitive about the impact, if any, on delivery. There are no viable alternative means of delivery the MRA4 capability. Prior to selecting the MRA4 option, an investment appraisal was conducted that considered a full range of alternatives. The findings were conclusive and confirmed the requirement for MRA4. This view has not changed.


Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
30285; 379 c499W;379 c495W
Session
2001-02
Subjects
Damages Administrative delays Expenditure Procurement Navy Military aircraft Surveillance BAE Systems Military intelligence Nimrod aircraft
Link
View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk