Written question asked by Llew Smith (Labour) on Friday, 12 December 2003, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Wednesday, 17 December 2003. It was answered by Stephen Timms (Labour) on Wednesday, 17 December 2003 on behalf of the Department of Trade and Industry.
Dept of Trade and Industry
- Question
- To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, if she will make a statement on (a) difficulties encountered and (b) strategies adopted in the decommissioning of the Windscale pile number 1 at Sellafield; and what the cost of this exercise has been so far. - Includes figures.
- Answer
-
Llew Smith: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if she will make a statement on (a) difficulties encountered and (b) strategies adopted in the decommissioning of the Windscale pile number one at Sellafield; and what the cost of this exercise has been so far. [144506] Mr. Timms: The Pile One reactor is considered by international experts to be one of the most challenging decommissioning tasks in the nuclear industry. The key challenges include: Limited knowledge of the extent of damage to the fire-affected core; Difficult access to some areas of the core; Ensuring a fire-free environment throughout the work; and Employing suitable remote-controlled machinery to remove hazardous material. Strategies have been adopted for two phases of the decommissioning. Phase One of the project, that of clearing up and sealing the air and water ducts, was successfully completed in 1999. This work ensured that the reactor continues to be maintained in a condition acceptable to the nuclear regulators. Phase Two, the current phase, involves removal of the hazardous materials and the treatment and packaging of the resulting waste. Problems with the initial design concept led to a rigorous technical review of the options for dismantling. This review is ongoing. Safety is UKAEA's highest priority and any decommissioning strategy must be shown to have addressed all known hazards. Phase One decommissioning costs were £14 million. Phase Two costs to date are approximately £30 million.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 144506; 415 c932-4W
- Session
- 2003-04
- Subjects
- Decommissioning Costs Fires Radioactive waste Nuclear power stations Radioactive materials Safety Waste disposal Sellafield
- Contains statistics
- Yes
- Link
- View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2013-11-25 12:12:24 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_804149
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_804149
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_804149