Skip to main content

Written question asked by Julian Lewis (Conservative) on Wednesday, 28 April 2004, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Thursday, 6 May 2004. It was answered by Ivor Caplin (Labour) on Thursday, 6 May 2004 on behalf of the Ministry of Defence.


Ministry of Defence

Question
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, for what reason the title of engineering artificer is to be replaced by that of engineering technician in the Royal Navy; what consultations were undertaken with non-commissioned Royal Naval personnel before the decision was taken; and if he will make a statement on the future of engineering apprenticeships in the Royal Navy.
Answer

Dr. Julian Lewis: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence for what reason the title of engineering artificer is to be replaced by that of engineering technician in the Royal Navy; what consultations were undertaken with non-commissioned Royal Naval personnel before the decision was taken; and if he will make a statement on the future of engineering apprenticeships in the Royal Navy. [170227] Mr. Caplin: The title Artificer no longer adequately describes the professional role that those personnel undertake in the modern Navy. Replacing it with Engineering Technicians will align the Navy with the standards of competence published by the Engineering Council United Kingdom, and refresh the image of this key role against increasingly competitive recruitment market forces. There has been wide consultation with Royal Navy Engineering Branch personnel of all ranks and rates during this review, covering all aspects of the proposals, including the title change. It is expected that satisfactory completion of Technician training will be recognised by the award of a Foundation Degree, providing the opportunity, for those who wish, to study to Bachelor Degree level, thereby enabling them to aspire to accreditation as Incorporated Engineers. The quality of the skilled, technically trained men and women provided to support the Fleet will be undiminished.


Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
420 c1716W; 170227
Session
2003-04
Subjects
Apprentices Engineering Navy Engineers Job description Technicians Non-commissioned ranks
Link
View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk