Skip to main content

Written question asked by Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat) on Wednesday, 19 January 2000, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Thursday, 3 February 2000. It was answered by Lord Moonie (Labour) on Thursday, 3 February 2000 on behalf of the Ministry of Defence.


Ministry of Defence

Question
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the ultra-wide band synthetic aperture radar programme; what has been the cost of the system to date; and if he will make a statement. - Including figure.
Answer

Mr. Hancock: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the ultra-wide band synthetic aperture radar programme; what has been the cost of the system to date; and if he will make a statement. [106158] Dr. Moonie: I assume that the question refers to the Remote Minefield Detection System (REMIDS) Technology Demonstrator Programme, which is investigating the development of a sensor to detect minefields and mined areas for military purposes. It is using Ultra-Wide Band Synthetic Aperture Radar (UWB SAR) as a preferred technology. Tests carried out in 1998 at short range from a ground vehicle proved the potential effectiveness of a UWB SAR in the detection role, and successfully detected plastic and metal targets representative of mine-like anti-tank ordnance. The equipment is currently in an early prototype stage and the tests did not represent a realistic environment. However, sufficient information has been generated to proceed with confidence with work on a more powerful airborne system. Approximately £390,000 has been spent to date.


Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
343 c675W; 106158
Session
1999-00
Subjects
Bomb disposal Expenditure Landmines Radar
Contains statistics
Yes