Skip to main content

Written question asked by Anthony Steen (Conservative) on Friday, 20 February 2004, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Thursday, 26 February 2004. It was answered by John Healey (Labour) on Thursday, 26 February 2004 on behalf of the Treasury.


Treasury

Question
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will change the policy of Her Majesty's Customs and Excise that genuine mistakes made in good faith are not reasonable excuses for surcharge purposes.
Answer

Mr. Steen: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will change the policy of Her Majesty's Customs and Excise that genuine mistakes made in good faith are not reasonable excuses for surcharge purposes. [156047] John Healey: The VAT system aims to encourage payment of the right tax at the right time. As well as safeguarding revenues, this provides equity for all taxpaying businesses. A business may be penalised if it does not pay the right tax at the right time: the misdeclaration penalty penalises significant or repeated errors in the amount of tax paid and the default surcharge penalises late payment. The VAT penalty system has safeguards to ensure that businesses are not treated over-harshly. For the smallest businesses, several warnings are issued before a late payment penalty is issued--so that a business would not be penalised until its fifth default. Both misdeclaration penalties and default penalties can be withdrawn if there is a reasonable excuse for an error or delay. In this context, reasonable excuses can include compassionate circumstances or unforeseen events. However, this would not include mistakes of the type to which the hon. Gentleman refers since the penalties are, in part, designed to encourage accuracy.


Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
156047; 418 c510W;418 c530W
Session
2003-04
Subjects
Companies Excise duties Payments Non-payment Small businesses Surcharges VAT
Link
View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk