Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Primarolo (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 7 June 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Finance Bill.


Finance Bill

The hon. Gentleman has referred to quite a bit of stuff that is not actually in the Bill, so he will have difficulty referring to it in Committee. On his point on clause 12, the measures are not retrospective. If he cares to look at the history of the previous Conservative Government and this Government in dealing with this particular kind of avoidance, he will see that measures targeted at tackling such avoidance did not work. So the Government have made a clear statement that said: ““This is subject to tax, and it will be paid.”” This has nothing to do with retrospection.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
434 c1153-4 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Accountancy Capital gains tax Corporation tax Income tax Gift aid National income Public expenditure Lump sum payments Public sector debt Tax avoidance Taxation VAT Stamp duties
Legislation
Finance Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk