Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Stephen Hesford (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 7 June 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Finance Bill.


Finance Bill

No, not at this point. In some sense, I follow the hon. Member for North Antrim (Rev. Ian Paisley) in saying that I speak with caution in this debate. This is certainly the first Finance Bill debate in which I have spoken in eight years, and I am no expert. Like him, I think that the detail is, of course, complex, but one cannot avoid these matters for ever. I understand that this is a rather small Finance Bill—it has only 72 clauses and 11 schedules—so I felt able to dip my toe into this economic debate. On the Bill’s background, it is sometimes said in Finance Bill debates that only two things are certain in life: one is death, the other is taxes. In terms of death, I want to place on record that the report of my electoral demise was premature. In terms of taxes, that is what the Bill is about. In terms of certainty about taxes, I look to the Liberal Benches and pose a question. We know that the 1p on income tax went by the board in previous elections. It is now reported that the 50 per cent. tax rate on income over £100,000 is about to go by the board. I wonder what the Liberal Democrat taxation policy will be at the next election—certainly, as things stand, it will be uncertain.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
434 c1172 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Accountancy Capital gains tax Corporation tax Income tax Gift aid National income Public expenditure Lump sum payments Public sector debt Tax avoidance Taxation VAT Stamp duties
Legislation
Finance Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk