Proceeding contribution from Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 June 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HL) on Charities Bill [HL].
Charities Bill [HL]
The noble Lord said that what the noble and gallant Lord wants could happen anyway under Clause 2(2)(l). Looking down the sweeping list of advancements which can be considered ““charities””, may I suggest that the advancement of peace would be consistent? Why does not the Minister simply include that if he is to continue doggedly defending the Government’s position on such a small matter?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 673 c137
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Clubs Appeals Charities Armed forces Assets Charity Commission Fees and charges Exemptions Ethics Private education Public appointments Regulation Scotland Registration Schools Religion Tax allowances Taxation Sports Charity Tribunal
- Legislation
- Charities Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-06-11 14:19:34 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260405
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260405
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260405