Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 June 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HL) on Charities Bill [HL].


Charities Bill [HL]

My Lords, I had originally proposed to oppose this amendment, because it seemed to me that putting ““and increase”” in line 4 was a potential increase in the regulatory burden. Indeed, I had been trying to persuade the Government, under new Section 1B(3)1—"““The public confidence objective is to increase public trust””—" to remove ““increase”” and put ““maintain””. I failed to achieve that earlier in Committee. I could hardly support the idea of increasing the effective use of regulatory burden implied thereby. If we are trying to find ways to increase the quantum of charitable resources by moving ““and increase”” to line 5, however, that seems to me to be a thoroughly praiseworthy objective. I am happy to support the amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c178-9 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Complaints Clubs Appeals Charities Armed forces Assets Charity Commission Fees and charges Exemptions Ethics Private education Public appointments Regulation Scotland Registration Schools Religion Tax allowances Taxation Sports Charity Tribunal
Legislation
Charities Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk