Proceeding contribution from Lord Swinfen (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 June 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HL) on Charities Bill [HL].
Charities Bill [HL]
Before the Minister sits down, he said that the Attorney-General might be drawn into the proceedings. Am I right in thinking that the Attorney-General would have to act on behalf of the Charity Commission and would not necessarily act on behalf of the charity? He also said that the Attorney-General would bear part of the charity’s costs if he was able to act on behalf of the charity. A very small charity may still not be able to cover the cost of legal proceedings, or even a small proportion of them. A large number of small charities working on small incomes with little or no capital at all could be wiped out completely by having to pay their own costs or a proportion of their costs in court. The Minister really ought to think again on the question of a suitor’s fund. It may never be needed, in which case it will cost absolutely nothing.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 673 c214-5
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Clubs Appeals Charities Armed forces Assets Charity Commission Fees and charges Exemptions Ethics Private education Public appointments Regulation Scotland Registration Schools Religion Tax allowances Taxation Sports Charity Tribunal
- Legislation
- Charities Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-06-11 14:19:29 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260533
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260533
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260533