Proceeding contribution from Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 June 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HL) on Charities Bill [HL].
Charities Bill [HL]
I realise that the Minister is working his way through the argument, but I simply do not understand that it is simpler for the lay man to wade through six pages of schedules with three columns in them than to give the lay man, trustee or charity a general right of appeal against the decision, direction or order emanating from the Charity Commission. How can it be simpler? Seriously, that is counterintuitive—it is counter to common sense.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 673 c227
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Clubs Appeals Charities Armed forces Assets Charity Commission Fees and charges Exemptions Ethics Private education Public appointments Regulation Scotland Registration Schools Religion Tax allowances Taxation Sports Charity Tribunal
- Legislation
- Charities Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-06-11 14:19:27 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260560
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260560
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260560