Proceeding contribution from Lord Lyell (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 July 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Road Safety Bill [HL].
Road Safety Bill [HL]
The noble Baroness says that that would be sensible. I think that she has made the case for me. She wishes to impose a blanket rule, but local authorities have to go through what she admits is bureaucracy to allow people to drive on roads that are not near a village, but miles away in the open. If I drive at 42 mph my licence will be taken away if the local authority does not go through the bureaucracy. We can have a reasonable amendment, as suggested by my noble friend. I am tempted to think that the noble Baroness is suggesting a blanket rule for rural lanes, but what is a rural lane? We could go on like that.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 673 c507
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Accidents Driving Injuries Insurance Prosecutions Negligence Pedestrians Standards Safety Roads Road signs and markings Speed limits Road traffic offences Rural areas Vehicles
- Legislation
- Road Safety Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 12:52:19 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260986
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260986
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260986