Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl of Dundee (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 July 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Road Safety Bill [HL].


Road Safety Bill [HL]

I thank the Minister very much for his helpful responses. I also thank the noble Lords, Lord Monson and Lord Berkeley, as well as my noble friend Lady Hanham for theirs. As indicated, a justice gap has been acknowledged by the Government. They have already suggested that the maximum penalty for dangerous driving should be raised to five years, and their consultation paper is already in favour of the institution of a new offence of causing death by careless driving. Thus, as earlier outlined, the purpose here is to encourage the Government to use the Bill in order to act upon their own intentions. I am extremely grateful to the Minister for his reassurance that he will act accordingly. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 86 not moved.] Clause 19 [Breach of requirements relating to children and seat belts]: [Amendments Nos. 87 to 89 not moved.] Clause 19 agreed to. Clause 20 [Using vehicle in dangerous condition etc.]:


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c522 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Accidents Driving Injuries Insurance Prosecutions Negligence Pedestrians Standards Safety Roads Road signs and markings Speed limits Road traffic offences Rural areas Vehicles
Legislation
Road Safety Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk