Proceeding contribution from Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 19 July 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Fraud Bill [HL].
Fraud Bill [HL]
I am sorry that the noble and learned Lord the former Attorney-General should advance that argument. As a mere solicitor—or former solicitor—I believe that the qualifying words of paragraph (b) are essential. I can see nothing wrong with what is being proposed.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 673 c1420-1
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Contracts Data protection Abuse Crime Conspiracy Common law Fraud Exemptions Powers Misrepresentation Married people Sales Reform Caveat emptor rule
- Legislation
- Fraud Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:25:06 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_263114
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_263114
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_263114