Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 12 October 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Charities Bill [HL].


Charities Bill [HL]

moved, as an amendment to Amendment No. 16, Amendment No. 17: Line 2, after ““must”” insert ““, where appropriate,”” The noble Lord said: My Lords, I am grateful for the undertaking that the noble Lord, Lord Bassam, gave at the end of his introduction of Amendment No. 16. It leaves me with little to say beyond the fact that NCVO, among many charities, was anxious about the effect of placing just a bare duty on the commission to have regard to the desirability of facilitating innovation. Just adding the words ““where appropriate”” or something like that would dispel its anxiety that an intervening commission could thunder around requiring innovation on all occasions by all charities—although that is highly unlikely, one must allow for the possibility. Many charities are not in the business of innovation at all; for example, almshouses are in the business of anything but that. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c339 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Clubs Appeals Charities Armed forces Charity Commission Charitable donations Finance Fees and charges Fundraising Regulation Registration Tax allowances Taxation Sports Charity Tribunal
Legislation
Charities Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk