Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Bill Wiggin (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 17 October 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Transport (Wales) Bill.


Transport (Wales) Bill

: I echo the Minister’s kind comments about the Chairman of the Select Committee, and indeed the Chairman of the Standing Committee. Their help and hard work were greatly appreciated. I think we are all familiar with the problems and issues that have been present throughout the scrutiny of our proposals. As the Minister said in Committee, the Bill is not about more powers for the Assembly, but about responsibilities for developing policies and strategies for the benefit of transport in Wales. However, the Assembly’s responsibility to implement the policies as well is just one of the aspects that have created problems that are still present. We should all like to see positive changes in the delivery of transport services in Wales, and I am sure that everyone here hopes that the Bill will achieve them. Yet since the outset we have had a number of concerns, which remain unsolved to an extent. They were addressed in Committee, but we must be sure that the Government are genuinely committed to living up to the assurances they have given. In Committee, the Minister admitted that"““There may well be severe problems developing policies within Wales.””" If that is what the representative of the Government feels about the Bill’s prospects, it is not really surprising that we too have our doubts. In Committee we debated, at some length, the finer details of developing the Wales transport strategy. I suggested that perhaps the Bill should require the Assembly to consult certain bodies as a matter of course. We were reassured about our desire to see all groups with an interest in transport developments, from local businesses to disabled people’s charities, being offered a genuine say in changes. The Welsh Assembly’s previous tendency to consult similar bodies on issues each time, and the criticism voiced about failings in the Assembly’s Committee system to deal properly with scrutiny, mean that we shall watch the development of that aspect carefully. We shall have to ensure that, as we were promised in Committee, the Assembly really does consult as many relevant organisations as possible, including those more likely to give unfavourable responses when new policies and developments are considered. The Minister also assured us that when the Wales transport strategy was being developed, cross-border issues would be taken fully into account. I think that he did that in his closing statements. I am grateful to him for taking on board the points that I asked him to consider, and for the way in which he responded. We have considered the cross-border issue consistently. In Committee, we were assured that the Government would accept responsibility for negotiating on behalf of English counties, and that any English local authority facing problems as a result of the strategy developed by the Assembly could make representations to a Minister such as the Secretary of State for Transport. We will be watching closely to ensure that the reasonable procedure that the Minister outlined for consultation and adjudication in the event of an impasse is followed. We were also assured that the Assembly would work with organisations that span the border, such as the many train companies that operate throughout England and Wales. In Committee we were promised"““a great deal of discussion””" with organisations contributing to the network in Wales that are based outside Wales. I look forward to seeing the results of that, too. During Committee, I stressed the need for local transport plans to be monitored to ensure that they were produced in reasonable time and stressed that, ““as soon as practicable””, the wording in the Bill, provides a closely monitored and sensible time limit. We were assured that no penalties were necessary to ensure the timely production of local transport plans and that local authorities must do as the Assembly says if it issues a direction regarding those plans. I was glad to hear the Minister confirm that and I hope that that will always prove to be the case. We will also watch with interest to ensure that joint transport authorities are genuinely appropriately funded, neither forcing more responsibilities onto local authorities without suitable funds, nor becoming another example of waste and inept usage of Welsh taxpayers’ hard-earned money. Despite assurances that the results of local authorities working together will be to produce savings rather than more costs, we must watch closely the impact of running a joint transport authority, which, sadly, is assumed will cost approximately £1 million per annum, in addition to £100,000 to £200,000 in setting-up costs. The potential for the creation of costly administration and support teams, new quangos and more bureaucracy must be held in check. Financial controls operating in the Assembly must work to ensure probity when committing public funds and to ensure that those funds are appropriate and well placed. Indeed, I was grateful for the Minister’s comments on that. In Committee, we were informed that joint transport authorities cannot cross the border, but local authorities can be instructed to consult on matters with JTAs. The Minister mentioned that I would be pleased about that. I remain absolutely impartial. Of course, I want what is best for Wales but, obviously, if the JTAs are working particularly well, they are something that we would like to see in operation across the border, too. We must be certain to check that they are as good as we hope they will be when cross-border issues come into play. We must also watch the practices of the public transport users committee for Wales, particularly on cross-border issues. During Committee, the Minister said that if those who live outside Wales have an issue relating to transport he"““would have thought that the committee would take up any representation that they made””. [Official Report, Standing Committee F, 28 June 2005, c. 13, 8, 44.]" That does not seem to be a particularly definite or optimistic view on the ability of those who use Welsh transport to have a voice. However, I look forward to seeing a truly effective and representative committee of users of Welsh transport. I am sure that we will all keep a watchful eye on anything untoward should it occur. We have debated in great detail the fact that the Bill gives the Assembly the ability to provide financial assistance only to services or facilities that would not exist without its help. We believe that the Assembly should be afforded the opportunity to help those services that can exist unaided even further. In certain cases, the Assembly should be given greater freedom to spend its money on whatever it believes to be most beneficial recipient. Perhaps that opportunity is most pertinent to aviation in Wales. I am sure that the Minister will remember that I said that I remain open-minded on the issue. Of course, it is advantageous to the Assembly to have the ability to fund air transport if it so desires, and those developments could have economic advantages for Wales, although that is far from proven. Obviously, the benefits to the Welsh economy must be considered.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
437 c648-50 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Access Disability Devolved matters Aviation Airports Air routes Cross border cooperation Infrastructure Local government Public transport National Assembly for Wales Railways Transport Wales Roads Cardiff Airport
Legislation
Transport (Wales) Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk