Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from David Wright (Labour) in the House of Commons on Friday, 21 October 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Armed Forces (Parliamentary Approval for Participation in Armed Conflict) Bill.


Armed Forces (Parliamentary Approval for Participation in Armed Conflict) Bill

I have great sympathy with the Bill in principle, but there are some problems with it, and perhaps my right hon. Friend could detail how she would deal with those. In particular, clause 2 requires the Prime Minister to look at"““the expected geographical extent of the participation . . . the expected duration of the participation, and . . . the particular bodies of Her Majesty’s armed forces that are expected to participate.””" My concern is that we would be telegraphing from the House how we intended to deploy our troops, exactly where we intended to deploy them and for how long. That would be a real strategic problem for our armed forces. Could my right hon. Friend explain how that would be presented?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
437 c1089 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Accountability Armed forces Armed conflict Deployment Democracy Prime Minister Parliamentary scrutiny Treaties Royal prerogative
Legislation
Armed Forces (Parliamentary Approval for Participation in Armed Conflict) Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk