Proceeding contribution from Clare Short (Labour) in the House of Commons on Friday, 21 October 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Armed Forces (Parliamentary Approval for Participation in Armed Conflict) Bill.
Armed Forces (Parliamentary Approval for Participation in Armed Conflict) Bill
One of the very troubling issues about the route to war is the way in which the longer legal opinion was kept secret from everyone, including members of the Cabinet. If such issues had to be brought before Parliament, the legal case would be more thoroughly scrutinised and the machinations and shenanigans, which are so troubling, would not occur. There is a democratic case for the Bill, but there is also the powerful argument that it would make for better decision making and protect our armed forces and our country’s reputation.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 437 c1091
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Accountability Armed forces Armed conflict Deployment Democracy Prime Minister Parliamentary scrutiny Treaties Royal prerogative
- Legislation
- Armed Forces (Parliamentary Approval for Participation in Armed Conflict) Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 20:06:28 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_268643
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_268643
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_268643