Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl Peel (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 25 October 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Commons Bill [HL].


Commons Bill [HL]

In extolling the virtues of Clause 9, it also escaped my mind to raise the ability of English Nature or CCW to invest—if I can use that word—in those severed rights. Could the Minister explain what would happen if such rights became available and the owner and Natural England wished to buy them? Would they be competing in the market place for the same rights or would Natural England come to the owner and find out whether he was interested in buying them first and what his intentions were? If the owner’s intentions were the same as English Nature or Natural England, it seems rather a waste of public funds.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c300GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Agriculture Common land Land use Grazing land Registration Commons councils Village greens
Legislation
Commons Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk