Proceeding contribution from Baroness Byford (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 7 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill.
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill
My Lords, in my earlier contribution I was not decrying what the Forestry Commission does, and I do not believe that the noble Lord has taken it that way. In fact, I am someone who walks in Dunwich forest and in many other areas. Our concern, which will presumably come up in Committee when we debate the matter in detail, is whether there was an overlap between the two causes. That is the area on which I could not go into further detail today—but I thank the noble Lord for his contribution.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 675 c452
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disadvantaged Agriculture Biodiversity Departmental responsibilities Enforcement Environment protection Forestry Joint Nature Conservation Committee Land use Management Nature conservation Sustainable development Rights of way Wildlife Rural areas Vehicles Sites of special scientific interest Commission for Rural Communities Inland Waterways Advisory Council Natural England
- Legislation
- Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 21:06:05 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_271167
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_271167
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_271167