Proceeding contribution from Viscount Bledisloe (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 8 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Racial and Religious Hatred Bill.
Racial and Religious Hatred Bill
My Lords, although I do not think that anyone would accuse either the noble Lord, Lord Avebury, or the noble Lord, Lord Lester, of being excessively brief in their remarks, they said absolutely nothing about either subsections (b) or (c) of their amendment, which would abolish a ““distinct offence””, whatever that may mean,"““of disturbing a religious service””" and a,"““religious offence of striking a person””—" whatever that phrase may mean.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 675 c529
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Crimes of violence Blasphemy Cemeteries Incitement Racially aggravated offences Religion Religious hatred Religious freedom Vandalism Religiously aggravated offences Racial hatred
- Legislation
- Racial and Religious Hatred Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 21:12:54 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_271836
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_271836
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_271836