Proceeding contribution from Baroness Flather (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 8 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Racial and Religious Hatred Bill.
Racial and Religious Hatred Bill
Thank you. I had not intended to speak to the amendment, but having listened to the debate I need to say something. First, the blasphemy law is out of date. Would we sit down today to consider a blasphemy law for any religion? No, we would not. Secondly, the Church of England does not require the law. The Church is strong enough and important enough not to need such protection. This is a Christian country. Its religion is accepted by the state. It is not a secular state, although there are many people in this country who do not realise that there is a state religion. We are moving towards a loosening of the ties between state and Church. That will benefit both bodies. There was a time when the state and the Church badly needed each other to keep order. That is not the case today. The Church of England does not need this archaic blasphemy law to protect it.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 675 c535-6
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Crimes of violence Blasphemy Cemeteries Incitement Racially aggravated offences Religion Religious hatred Religious freedom Vandalism Religiously aggravated offences Racial hatred
- Legislation
- Racial and Religious Hatred Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 21:12:58 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_271853
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_271853
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_271853