Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness D'Souza (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 8 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Racial and Religious Hatred Bill.


Racial and Religious Hatred Bill

My Lords, perhaps I could remind your Lordships of the time in the early 1990s during the height of the Rushdie affair when Muslims thought it right and proper to burn copies of his novel The Satanic Verses and effigies of Salman Rushdie himself. Where would such actions fall under the amendment? It suggests that the amendment needs greater definition. Of course we all deplore the desecration of the graves that we have heard about recently, but the amendment is still too broad. Another area that might come under its aegis, which again is contentious, and which has certainly been tested in the US, is flag burning. I remember going to great lengths, along with many other people—some of whom are in your Lordships’ House—to defend the burning of flags. It may be that we would fall on the wrong side of the law if the amendment were agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c549 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Crimes of violence Blasphemy Cemeteries Incitement Racially aggravated offences Religion Religious hatred Religious freedom Vandalism Religiously aggravated offences Racial hatred
Legislation
Racial and Religious Hatred Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk