Proceeding contribution from Chris Bryant (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 3 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Terrorism Bill.
Terrorism Bill
: The hon. Gentleman said that he had given a good example. I am not sure that it is. There may be a necessity to tidy up the clause, but how would he prove that buying the suit was linked to the intention to commit a terrorist act without someone having engaged in something that was ostensibly part of such an act?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 438 c997
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Criminal investigation Asylum Companies Directors Liability Incitement International law Nuclear weapons Protest Proscribed organisations Radioactive materials Terrorism Training Trespass Encouragement of terrorism
- Legislation
- Terrorism Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 22:45:09 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_275353
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_275353
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_275353