Proceeding contribution from David Drew (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 3 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Terrorism Bill.
Terrorism Bill
As the Under-Secretary should know, the problem at Fairford is that the police determined the perimeter around the base. It was not the perimeter of Fairford—the police chose a zone that was well around Fairford. They either exclude people from it or issue them with section 44 certificates. The provision gives the authorities enormous power and we need to know exactly what it entails for law enforcement agencies’ responsibilities.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 438 c1038
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Criminal investigation Asylum Companies Directors Liability Incitement International law Nuclear weapons Protest Proscribed organisations Radioactive materials Terrorism Training Trespass Encouragement of terrorism
- Legislation
- Terrorism Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 22:44:26 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_275504
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_275504
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_275504