Proceeding contribution from Lord Chorley (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 9 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Commons Bill [HL].
Commons Bill [HL]
I do not understand why subsection (3) includes gorse and not bracken, which is a far more significant problem. Why not leave out gorse?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 675 c200GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Access Agriculture Common land Fees and charges Functions Land use Grazing land Ownership Powers Membership Payments Management Nature conservation Registration Commons councils Village greens
- Legislation
- Commons Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:23:53 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_275891
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_275891
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_275891