Proceeding contribution from Lord Bach (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 9 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Commons Bill [HL].
Commons Bill [HL]
The noble Lord’s point is so good that, if the Committee agrees, we will take out paragraph (g) of subsection (3)—we were going to do that before the noble Lord spoke. Amendment No. 159, to which the noble Duke spoke, includes in the illustrative list of functions given to a commons association the power to control access of common rights holders and their animals to a common. That is not necessary, as subsection (3)(a) and subsection (1) as amended by government Amendment No. 142 would allow commons associations to be given a function of making rules relating to the management of agricultural activities. Limiting periods when rights-holders can de-pasture their animals on a common will be a key management tool for any association, so we do not see the need to express that as a separate function in the Bill.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 675 c200GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Access Agriculture Common land Fees and charges Functions Land use Grazing land Ownership Powers Membership Payments Management Nature conservation Registration Commons councils Village greens
- Legislation
- Commons Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:19:26 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_275892
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_275892
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_275892