Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Earl Peel (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 9 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Commons Bill [HL].

Commons Bill [HL]

The Minister said that Amendment No. 174, in the name of my noble friend Lady Byford, was not satisfactory because it would impede the effectiveness of a commons association. What would happen if, through the formation of a commons association, the owner was disenfranchised or disproportionately out of pocket? Presumably, the payment scheme installed by the association would have to take that into account. So it would not necessarily be across the board; it would have to be pro rata according to the losses incurred by each individual party.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c220GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Access Agriculture Common land Fees and charges Functions Land use Grazing land Ownership Powers Membership Payments Management Nature conservation Registration Commons councils Village greens
Legislation
Commons Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk