Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 9 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Commons Bill [HL].


Commons Bill [HL]

I support my noble friend. It will be bitterly resented if the Bill does not provide a clear way for a commons association to have its case heard in a manner which meets the normal requirements of natural justice. In its present form, Clause 33(3) appears to give the kind of centralised control that the Minister has been at pains to say he is seeking to avoid in the Bill. I think that Amendment No. 187, tabled by my noble friends, is the right way forward. We have discussed the role of the commons commissioner at a previous sitting of the Committee. Perhaps the Minister can suggest the use of some other mechanism, but if he is not able to find something which will ensure that a dispassionate view is taken of issues of this sort—when a commons association feels that it is being unreasonably overruled—we shall have to go back to the commons commissioner. There must be a way in which these issues can be addressed independently. For that reason, I hope that the Minister will think very carefully indeed about the suggestion before him.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c231GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Access Agriculture Common land Fees and charges Functions Land use Grazing land Ownership Powers Membership Payments Management Nature conservation Registration Commons councils Village greens
Legislation
Commons Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk